Gerson S N
Peer Review Analysis, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1994 Mar-Apr;3(2):31-5.
Corporate America's healthcare cost crisis and the country's budget deficit are forcing limits on the resources used to finance healthcare, including mental healthcare. At the same time, the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act bars discrimination against patients with chronic illnesses, including chronic mental illness. Therefore, corporate benefits managers need guidance on how to ethically and rationally allocate scarce clinical resources to those high-morbidity insureds who utilize disproportionate amounts of these resources. In particular, how should we define the public/private interface: When do patients who repeatedly fail to respond to treatment fall out of the private sector's responsibility? The author, medical director for a leading behavioral healthcare utilization management company, offers the following guidelines recommending reasonable and practical limitations on trials of treatment for seven common categories of difficult psychiatric patients.
美国企业界的医疗成本危机以及国家预算赤字,正迫使用于资助医疗保健(包括精神保健)的资源受到限制。与此同时,1990年的《美国残疾人法案》禁止歧视慢性病患者,包括慢性精神疾病患者。因此,企业福利经理需要有关如何在道德和合理的基础上,将稀缺的临床资源分配给那些使用了不成比例资源的高发病率被保险人的指导。特别是,我们应该如何界定公共/私营部门的界限:那些多次治疗无效的患者何时不再属于私营部门的责任范围?本文作者是一家领先的行为医疗保健利用管理公司的医学总监,提供了以下指导方针,建议对七类常见的难治性精神病患者的治疗试验进行合理且实际的限制。