• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未经事先批准进行克隆:对近期违规行为披露的回应。

Cloning without prior approval: a response to recent disclosures of noncompliance.

作者信息

Macklin R

机构信息

Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1995 Mar;5(1):57-60. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0077.

DOI:10.1353/ken.0.0077
PMID:10141719
Abstract

In September 1994, the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal published a special issue on the ethics of embryo splitting or "cloning," which included papers originally prepared for a workshop on embryo splitting sponsored by the National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction (NABER) and NABER's report, Human Cloning through Embryo Splitting. The impetus for the project was embryo-splitting research conducted by Drs. Jerry L. Hall, Robert J. Stillman, and others, at George Washington University and presented in October 1993 at a joint meeting of the American Fertility Society and the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Media coverage at the time reported that the research had been approved by the university's formal review committees. However, it came to light in December 1994 that the researchers had not obtained approval from the university's institutional review board prior to conducting the research. Following a university investigation, the researchers were disciplined and instructed to destroy their data. The university also voluntarily forwarded the records of the incident to the Office for Protection from Research Risks at the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Hall resigned from George Washington University in September 1994. In the following postscript to her article on the ethics of embryo splitting (KIEJ, September 1994), Ruth Macklin discusses these events. The letters and memoranda that she cites were obtained from NIH through the Freedom of Information Act.

摘要

1994年9月,《肯尼迪伦理学杂志》出版了一期关于胚胎分裂或“克隆”伦理的特刊,其中包括最初为生殖伦理国家咨询委员会(NABER)主办的胚胎分裂研讨会准备的论文以及NABER的报告《通过胚胎分裂进行人类克隆》。该项目的推动因素是杰里·L·霍尔博士、罗伯特·J·斯蒂尔曼博士等人在乔治·华盛顿大学进行的胚胎分裂研究,该研究于1993年10月在美国生育协会和加拿大生育与男科学协会的联席会议上发表。当时的媒体报道称该研究已获得大学正式审查委员会的批准。然而,1994年12月发现研究人员在开展研究之前并未获得大学机构审查委员会的批准。经过大学调查,研究人员受到了纪律处分并被要求销毁他们的数据。该大学还自愿将该事件的记录转交给了国立卫生研究院的研究风险防护办公室。霍尔博士于1994年9月从乔治·华盛顿大学辞职。露丝·麦克林在其关于胚胎分裂伦理的文章(《肯尼迪伦理学杂志》,1994年9月)的后记中讨论了这些事件。她引用的信件和备忘录是通过《信息自由法》从国立卫生研究院获取的。

相似文献

1
Cloning without prior approval: a response to recent disclosures of noncompliance.未经事先批准进行克隆:对近期违规行为披露的回应。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1995 Mar;5(1):57-60. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0077.
2
When OPRR (Office for Protection from Research Risks) comes calling: enforcing Federal research regulations.当保护研究风险办公室(OPRR)登门拜访时:执行联邦研究法规。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1995 Mar;5(1):51-5. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0049.
3
University probe faults 'cloning' research.
Sci News. 1994 Dec 17;146(25):406.
4
Embryo cloners jumped the gun.
Science. 1994 Dec 23;266(5193):1949.
5
A clone by any other name is still an ethical concern.换个名字的克隆仍是一个伦理问题。
JAMA. 1994 Feb 2;271(5):331-2.
6
Testimony before the NIH Human Embryo Research Panel.在美国国立卫生研究院人类胚胎研究小组面前的证词。
Linacre Q. 1994 Nov;61(4):82-9. doi: 10.1080/20508549.1999.11878283.
7
Ethics of cloning: who decides?
Washington Post. 1993 Nov 16:Health, 12-13, 15.
8
Institutional review boards. A net too thin.机构审查委员会。一张网过疏。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1996 May-Jun;26(3):4.
9
NIH guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules.美国国立卫生研究院关于涉及重组DNA分子研究的指南。
Account Res. 1993;3(2-3):177-85. doi: 10.1080/08989629308573848.
10
Human gene therapy: application, ethics and regulation.人类基因治疗:应用、伦理与监管
Dickinson Law Rev. 1992 Summer;96(4):733-63.

引用本文的文献

1
Twinning and Individuation: An Appraisal of the Current Model and Ethical Implications.双胎妊娠与个体化:对当前模型及伦理意义的评估
Biology (Basel). 2025 Jan 21;14(2):104. doi: 10.3390/biology14020104.