Jackson T
NHMRC National Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Monash University, Victoria.
Aust Health Rev. 1995;18(1):105-16.
This paper distinguishes three separate ways in which casemix measurement serves as a foundation for hospital and health system reform. At the hospital level, diagnosis related groups provide a means of describing kinds of acute inpatient care which in turn facilitates utilisation review activities essential to modern clinical and financial management. At the system level, casemix adjusters such as diagnosis related groups provide the basis for comparisons of productive efficiency across institutions, and reduce the risk of adverse funder reactions to higher per case costs which are attributable to differences in casemix. States are increasingly using casemix as the basis for funding hospitals in order to reduce non-casemix related differences. Finally, health reform experiments in using market-like mechanisms (such as managed competition, purchaser-provider split) require at a minimum that the product purchased be precisely specified, and that clinical risks of cost overruns be equalised amongst insurers or providers.
本文区分了病例组合测量作为医院和卫生系统改革基础的三种不同方式。在医院层面,诊断相关组提供了一种描述急性住院护理类型的方法,这反过来又促进了对现代临床和财务管理至关重要的利用审查活动。在系统层面,诸如诊断相关组之类的病例组合调整器为跨机构的生产效率比较提供了基础,并降低了资助者对因病例组合差异导致的更高单病例成本产生负面反应的风险。各国越来越多地将病例组合作为医院资金的基础,以减少与病例组合无关的差异。最后,利用类似市场机制(如管理竞争、购买者-提供者分离)的卫生改革试验至少要求精确规定所购买的产品,并使保险公司或提供者之间成本超支的临床风险均等化。