Scotton D
National Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Monash University, Melbourne.
Aust Health Rev. 1995;18(1):82-104.
Rising costs and slower economic growth are resulting in progressive stress on the current structure of health care finance in Australia. As in other developed countries, managed competition offers a potential solution, by increasing system efficiency. The case for restructuring current financing arrangements is even stronger than in other countries because of inefficiencies arising from inconsistencies and overlaps between Commonwealth, State and private sector functions. This paper outlines an illustrative model for managed competition in Australia. In addition, it discusses in more detail two specific issues which have received some attention in the literature: whether to have multiple payers, in the form of competing public and private budget holders; and whether 'catastrophic risks' such as long-term institutional care should be incorporated in a managed competition program.
成本上升和经济增长放缓正给澳大利亚当前的医疗保健融资结构带来越来越大的压力。与其他发达国家一样,管理型竞争通过提高系统效率提供了一种潜在的解决方案。由于联邦、州和私营部门职能之间的不一致和重叠导致效率低下,澳大利亚重组当前融资安排的理由比其他国家更为充分。本文概述了澳大利亚管理型竞争的一个示例模型。此外,它更详细地讨论了文献中已受到一些关注的两个具体问题:是否以相互竞争的公共和私人预算持有者的形式设立多个支付方;以及诸如长期机构护理等“灾难性风险”是否应纳入管理型竞争计划。