• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一个安全模块,以满足监管机构对医院工作人员安全教育的要求。

Development of a safety module to satisfy the requirements of regulatory agencies for hospital staff safety education.

作者信息

Lowe G R

机构信息

Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock 72202, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care. 1995 Jan;40(1):35-8.

PMID:10142884
Abstract

UNLABELLED

We developed a self-administered safety module (SM) to instruct respiratory care (RC) employees in their responsibilities during emergency situations. The SM has five phases--a pretest (PRE), statement of module objectives, presentation of information in outline form, a posttest (POST), and review of the POST. This training meets the specific requirements outlined by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.

METHODS

To evaluate the effectiveness of the SM, we compared test scores among three groups of employees: those with no previous exposure to safety education in the hospital setting (G1), those with exposure at other institutions (G2), and those with exposure at this institution (G3). Our goal was to equalize the POST scores among the three groups. Using a 1-way analysis of variance, we tested to find whether the PRE scores were different from one another and repeated the test for the POST scores. We tested for within-group differences, PRE vs POST, using paired t tests.

RESULTS

Previous exposure to hospital safety management was associated with significantly higher PRE scores (p < 0.001). No previous exposure was associated with the greatest improvement (POST vs PRE), although all groups experienced significant improvement (p < 0.05). The POST scores for G1 were significantly lower than those of either G2 or G3 (p < 0.001). However, they were still adequate to pass (> or = 80%).

CONCLUSION

This self-administered SM is an effective and efficient method of educating RC personnel, regardless of entry-level knowledge, in safety issues and, although the POST scores were not statistically equalized, these scores were all sufficient to pass. Further evaluation of this process will include assessment of knowledge retention among employees.

摘要

未标注

我们开发了一个自我管理的安全模块(SM),用于指导呼吸护理(RC)员工在紧急情况下的职责。该安全模块有五个阶段——预测试(PRE)、模块目标说明、以大纲形式呈现信息、后测试(POST)以及对后测试的回顾。此培训符合美国职业安全与健康管理局以及医疗保健机构认证联合委员会规定的特定要求。

方法

为评估安全模块的有效性,我们比较了三组员工的测试成绩:医院环境中此前未接受过安全教育的员工(G1组)、在其他机构接受过安全教育的员工(G2组)以及在本机构接受过安全教育的员工(G3组)。我们的目标是使三组的后测试成绩达到均衡。使用单向方差分析,我们测试三组的预测试成绩是否彼此不同,并对后测试成绩重复此测试。我们使用配对t检验来测试组内差异,即预测试成绩与后测试成绩的差异。

结果

此前接触过医院安全管理与显著更高的预测试成绩相关(p < 0.001)。尽管所有组都有显著提高(p < 0.05),但此前未接触过安全教育的组(G1组)提高幅度最大。G1组的后测试成绩显著低于G2组和G3组(p < 0.001)。然而,这些成绩仍足以通过(≥ 80%)。

结论

这个自我管理的安全模块是一种有效且高效的方法,可用于向呼吸护理人员传授安全问题,无论其入门知识水平如何。尽管后测试成绩在统计学上未达到均衡,但这些成绩都足以通过。对该过程的进一步评估将包括对员工知识留存情况的评估。

相似文献

1
Development of a safety module to satisfy the requirements of regulatory agencies for hospital staff safety education.开发一个安全模块,以满足监管机构对医院工作人员安全教育的要求。
Respir Care. 1995 Jan;40(1):35-8.
2
Effective hospital safety orientation.
J Healthc Prot Manage. 2002 Summer;18(2):1-10.
3
Can nursing facility staff with minimal education be successfully trained with computer-based training?受教育程度较低的护理机构工作人员能否通过基于计算机的培训获得成功培训?
Nurse Educ Today. 2004 May;24(4):301-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2004.02.004.
4
A student-led demonstration project on fall prevention in a long-term care facility.一个由学生主导的长期护理机构预防跌倒示范项目。
Geriatr Nurs. 2007 Sep-Oct;28(5):312-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2007.04.014.
5
Special report. Complying with the 1995 JCAHO security and safety standards: Part I.
Hosp Secur Saf Manage. 1995 May;16(1):5-8.
6
Teaching strategies and knowledge retention.教学策略与知识保留
J Nurs Staff Dev. 1997 Sep-Oct;13(5):249-53.
7
Joint Commission president outlines top strategic priorities to aid QI efforts.联合委员会主席概述了帮助质量改进工作的首要战略重点。
Hosp Peer Rev. 2001 Jun;26(6):73-6.
8
[Evaluation of occupational safety training effectiveness in healthcare workers].[医护人员职业安全培训效果评估]
Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2005 Sep-Oct;61(5):451-65.
9
Computer system trains employees to meet JCAHO safety ED requirements.计算机系统培训员工以满足联合委员会医疗机构评审国际联合委员会(JCAHO)的安全急诊部要求。
Hosp Secur Saf Manage. 1997 Feb;17(10):12-3.
10
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.