Aaronson W E, Zinn J S, Rosko M D
Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 1995 Sep;52(3):364-88. doi: 10.1177/107755879505200303.
Two policy changes in 1988, one administrative and one legislative, allowed greater Medicare coverage of subacute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). The Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act (MCCA) of 1988, in conjunction with an administrative directive, or transmittal, from the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), changed the Medicare SNF benefit structure substantially. In this study, we specified a simultaneous equation system to explain the effects of the benefit changes on Medicare use. The results suggest that the two policy changes increased Medicare use in Pennsylvania SNFs substantially; however, the increase was associated with facility and case mix characteristics, which suggest that the increase was largely attributable to reclassification of current patients from other payer categories, Medicaid and self-pay, rather than new admissions. The effects of the MCCA and the HCFA transmittal on increased Medicare use were unanticipated and have important implications for the way in which subacute care is defined and financed in future benefit discussions.
1988年的两项政策变革,一项是行政方面的,一项是立法方面的,使得医疗保险对专业护理机构(SNFs)中次急性护理的覆盖范围得以扩大。1988年的《医疗保险灾难性覆盖法案》(MCCA),连同医疗保健财务管理局(HCFA)发布的一项行政指令或通知,极大地改变了医疗保险SNF福利结构。在本研究中,我们指定了一个联立方程系统来解释福利变化对医疗保险使用情况的影响。结果表明,这两项政策变革使宾夕法尼亚州SNFs的医疗保险使用量大幅增加;然而,这种增加与机构和病例组合特征相关,这表明增加在很大程度上归因于将当前患者从其他付费类别(医疗补助和自费)重新分类,而非新入院患者。MCCA和HCFA通知对医疗保险使用量增加的影响是出乎意料的,并且对未来福利讨论中次急性护理的定义和融资方式具有重要意义。