• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院的质量改进:能在多大程度上降低医疗成本?

Quality improvement in hospitals: how much does it reduce healthcare costs?

作者信息

Jones S B

机构信息

Blackley Memorial Hospital, Cochran, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Healthc Qual. 1995 Sep-Oct;17(5):11-3; quiz 13, 48. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.1995.tb00796.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1945-1474.1995.tb00796.x
PMID:10144981
Abstract

The philosophy of W.E. Deming suggests that continuous quality improvement efforts, when properly applied, ultimately will lead to financial dividends and will help ensure business longevity. Reducing hospital charges can be exciting for the participants and can provide an impetus for expanding quality improvement efforts. Americans, however, tend to demand almost instant gratification and have limited patience for longer-term results. This factor, coupled with minimal knowledge of actual operational costs and inaccurate charge accounting systems, may lead hospital managers to misinterpret the potential net long-term effects of their quality improvement efforts. In the approaching environment of capitated reimbursement, such mistakes may have serious consequences.

摘要

W.E.戴明的理念表明,持续质量改进工作若应用得当,最终将带来经济收益,并有助于确保企业长久发展。降低医院收费对参与者而言可能令人振奋,还能为扩大质量改进工作提供动力。然而,美国人往往追求几乎即时的满足感,对长期成果的耐心有限。这一因素,再加上对实际运营成本了解甚少以及收费核算系统不准确,可能导致医院管理者误解其质量改进工作潜在的长期净效应。在即将到来的按人头付费报销环境中,此类错误可能会产生严重后果。

相似文献

1
Quality improvement in hospitals: how much does it reduce healthcare costs?医院的质量改进:能在多大程度上降低医疗成本?
J Healthc Qual. 1995 Sep-Oct;17(5):11-3; quiz 13, 48. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.1995.tb00796.x.
2
Incentives for cooperation in quality improvement among hospitals--the impact of the reimbursement system.医院间质量改进合作的激励措施——报销制度的影响
J Health Econ. 1998 Dec;17(6):701-28. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(98)00026-5.
3
Developing hospital efficiency-cost control measures.制定医院效率成本控制措施。
World Hosp Health Serv. 2002;38(3):2-9, 41, 43.
4
Hospitals question the return on their TQM investment.医院对其全面质量管理投资的回报提出质疑。
Hosp Health Netw. 1994 Apr 5;68(7):63.
5
Implementing CQI projects in hospitals.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000 Aug;26(8):476-87. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26040-9.
6
Measuring the impact of quality improvement efforts.衡量质量改进工作的影响。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1994 Sep;48(9):32-4, 36.
7
QIOs offer costs savings, quality, but will they last?质量改进组织能够节省成本、保证质量,但它们能持续下去吗?
Hosp Peer Rev. 1996 Nov;21(11):152-4.
8
Transforming the care delivery system.变革医疗服务提供系统。
Hosp Health Netw. 2013 Jan;87(1):following 68.
9
Activity-based analyses lead to better decision making.基于活动的分析有助于做出更好的决策。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1998 Aug;52(8):66-70.
10
Total quality in health organizations.卫生组织的全面质量。
J Hosp Mark. 1996;11(1):35-51. doi: 10.1300/J043v11n01_04.