Suppr超能文献

医生对辅助服务的所有权:是间接需求诱导还是质量保证?

Physician ownership of ancillary services: indirect demand inducement or quality assurance?

作者信息

Mitchell J M, Sass T R

机构信息

Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 1995 Aug;14(3):263-89. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(95)00003-z.

Abstract

This paper analyzes two competing explanations for the ownership of ancillary facilities by referring physicians: indirect demand inducement and quality assurance. Consistent with the demand-inducement explanation we find physician-owned clinics treat patients for 50 percent more visits than do independent clinics and the differential is directly related to factors facilitating demand inducement. We find no difference in quality of care across ownership structures, however. In further support of the demand-inducement hypothesis we find that physical therapists are less likely to work in physician-owned clinics in states where therapists are allowed to practice independently.

摘要

本文分析了转诊医生拥有附属设施的两种相互竞争的解释

间接需求诱导和质量保证。与需求诱导的解释一致,我们发现医生拥有的诊所治疗的患者就诊次数比独立诊所多50%,且这种差异与促进需求诱导的因素直接相关。然而,我们发现不同所有制结构的医疗质量并无差异。为进一步支持需求诱导假说,我们发现,在允许物理治疗师独立执业的州,他们在医生拥有的诊所工作的可能性较小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验