Buckingham K
Department of Public Health, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK.
J Health Econ. 1993 Oct;12(3):301-9. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(93)90013-5.
This note presents a simplified description of the Healthy Years Equivalent (HYE) health outcome measure. I examine the claims made for the HYE and discuss their theoretical validity. The HYE is shown to be conceptually flawed because of confusions between the measures of value and the things being valued. Under close inspection the unnecessarily complicated multiple stage valuation used to determine the HYE is seen to be no more than an indirect way of asking the Time Trade-Off. For this reason the claimed superiority of the method over the Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) is rejected.
本笔记对健康等效年(HYE)这一健康结果测量方法进行了简化描述。我审视了关于HYE的主张,并讨论了其理论有效性。结果表明,由于价值衡量与被衡量事物之间存在混淆,HYE在概念上存在缺陷。经过仔细审视,用于确定HYE的不必要的复杂多阶段估值不过是询问时间权衡的一种间接方式。因此,该方法相对于质量调整生命年(QALY)所宣称的优越性被否定。