• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

免税标准:定义衡量方法。

Tax-exempt yardstick: defining the measurements.

作者信息

Kuchler J A

机构信息

Healthcare Financial Management Association, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Healthc Financ Manage. 1992 Feb;46(2):20-4, 26, 28 passim.

PMID:10145570
Abstract

Congress, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and state and local governments still are trying to determine requirements a hospital must meet to warrant tax exemption. Revisions to a bill introduced by Rep. Brian Donnelly (D-Mass.) likely will focus Congressional debate on whether charity care or the broader concept of community benefits is the most appropriate measure for not-for-profit hospitals to meet; the IRS may develop intermediate sanctions it could impose on errant not-for-profit facilities in lieu of a total revocation of tax-exempt status; and perhaps the most stringent clamp-down on healthcare facilities' tax-exempt status will come from state and local governments that develop boundaries for tax-exempt hospitals to maintain. Not-for-profit facilities can respond to increased scrutiny by viewing government challenges as opportunities to "tell their stories" about charity care and community benefits.

摘要

国会、美国国税局(IRS)以及州和地方政府仍在努力确定医院为获得免税资格必须满足的要求。众议员布莱恩·唐纳利(Brian Donnelly,民主党,马萨诸塞州)提出的法案修订案可能会使国会的辩论聚焦于慈善医疗还是更广泛的社区福利概念才是衡量非营利性医院是否达标的最合适标准;美国国税局可能会制定中间制裁措施,对违规的非营利性机构进行处罚,而不是完全撤销其免税资格;或许对医疗机构免税资格最严格的限制将来自州和地方政府,它们会划定免税医院的维持界限。非营利性机构可以将政府的审查视为讲述慈善医疗和社区福利“故事”的机会,以此来应对日益严格的审查。

相似文献

1
Tax-exempt yardstick: defining the measurements.免税标准:定义衡量方法。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1992 Feb;46(2):20-4, 26, 28 passim.
2
Revise or preserve? A flurry of views on revision of tax-exemption standards.修订还是保留?关于修订免税标准的一系列观点。
Health Prog. 1992 Jan-Feb;73(1):38-41, 64.
3
Community benefit prevails. Are radical changes in hospital tax-exemption laws necessary?社区利益至上。医院免税法律有必要进行彻底变革吗?
Health Prog. 1992 Jan-Feb;73(1):42-7.
4
Tax-exempt challenges warrant hospitals' attention.免税挑战值得医院关注。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1991 Jan;45(1):30, 32, 34-8.
5
Is your organization's tax-exempt status at risk?贵机构的免税地位会受到威胁吗?
Healthc Financ Manage. 1996;Suppl:4-9.
6
Under the gun.在压力之下。
Health Prog. 1990 Apr;71(3):59-63, 74.
7
Tax exemption: why not-for-profits deserve it.免税:非营利组织为何应获免税待遇。
Health Prog. 1988 Apr;69(3):34-5, 91.
8
A systematic method of accountability. Sound policies allow facilities to account for the level of charity care they provide.一种系统的问责方法。合理的政策使医疗机构能够对其所提供的慈善医疗水平负责。
Health Prog. 1992 Nov;73(9):46-51, 57.
9
The not-for-profit debate.
Healthtexas. 1992 Jul;48(6):10-1.
10
Overcoming challenges to tax-exempt status.克服免税地位面临的挑战。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1996 Apr;50(4):58-63, 65.