Morris A H
LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT 84143.
Respir Care. 1993 Jul;38(7):829-38; discussion 838-41.
The evaluation of new therapy poses a formidable challenge in intensive care medicine. When therapy evaluation cannot be double-blinded, as in the evaluation of extracorporeal support, the problem becomes more difficult. The result of the extracorporeal clinical trial, like that of the ECMO trial in the 1970s, is a potent reminder of the importance of concurrent controls in such evaluations. We should view with caution ethical objections to controlled trials of therapies that are not supported by credible data. A stronger ethical argument may frequently be mounted in favor of a randomized, controlled clinical trial. This is particularly pertinent in the high-technology ICU environment in which information overload is intense. The establishment of ICU human laboratories should enable the medical community to make much needed progress and help us identify the useful elements in our therapeutic armamentarium.
新疗法的评估在重症医学中构成了一项艰巨的挑战。当疗法评估无法进行双盲时,如在体外支持评估中,问题就变得更加困难。体外临床试验的结果,就像20世纪70年代的体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)试验一样,有力地提醒了在这类评估中进行同期对照的重要性。对于没有可靠数据支持的疗法进行对照试验所提出的伦理异议,我们应谨慎看待。支持进行随机对照临床试验的伦理论据往往更为有力。这在信息过载严重的高科技重症监护病房环境中尤为相关。建立重症监护病房人体实验室应能使医学界取得急需的进展,并帮助我们识别治疗手段中的有用要素。