• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联邦医疗保健监管重新调整的替代方案。

Alternatives to Federal regulatory realignment of health care.

作者信息

Kalkhof C J

机构信息

Group Health Inc., Buffalo, NY.

出版信息

Healthc Financ Manage. 1994 Jan;48(1):34, 36, 38 passim.

PMID:10145932
Abstract

In this article, author Christopher J. Kalkhof puts forth the view that the U.S. healthcare system could be made more cost effective and cost efficient without the implementation of government-directed managed competition strategies. Noting that current private sector initiatives already are forming more cost-sensitive integrated delivery and financing mechanisms, Kalkhof asserts that corresponding realignment initiatives for publicly financed healthcare benefit programs would provide additional incentive and momentum for these private sector efforts without requiring reconfiguration of the healthcare system by the government.

摘要

在本文中,作者克里斯托弗·J·卡尔霍夫提出了这样一种观点,即美国医疗保健系统无需实施政府主导的管理式竞争策略,也能够提高成本效益和成本效率。卡尔霍夫指出,当前私营部门的举措已经在形成更具成本敏感性的综合服务与融资机制,他断言,针对公共融资的医疗保健福利项目进行相应的调整举措,将为这些私营部门的努力提供额外的激励和动力,而无需政府对医疗保健系统进行重新配置。

相似文献

1
Alternatives to Federal regulatory realignment of health care.联邦医疗保健监管重新调整的替代方案。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1994 Jan;48(1):34, 36, 38 passim.
2
Mental health services under health reform: the less government, the better.医疗改革下的心理健康服务:政府干预越少越好。
Manag Care Q. 1994 Spring;2(2):10-2.
3
Reform proposals aim at a health-care system that no longer exists.改革提案针对的是一个已不复存在的医疗体系。
Health Manage Q. 1994;16(2):3-6.
4
Health care reform: clarifying the concepts.医疗保健改革:厘清概念。
J Community Health Nurs. 1993;10(4):199-211. doi: 10.1207/s15327655jchn1004_1.
5
Where it was, where it is, and where it should go. Historical perspectives of healthcare policy and the evolution of a new model for healthcare delivery.它曾在何处、现处何方以及应向何处发展。医疗保健政策的历史视角与医疗服务新模式的演变。
Cost Qual Q J. 1998 Dec;4(4):7-18.
6
Federal official discusses reform. Interview by Debra Mamorsky.
J Health Care Benefits. 1993 Sep-Oct;3(1):37-42.
7
National health care reform and a single-payer system: messiah or pariah?国家医疗保健改革与单一支付者制度:救世主还是贱民?
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1997 Winter;19(3):341-56.
8
The Clinton health care reform proposal: efficiency, fairness, and the role of government.克林顿医疗保健改革提案:效率、公平与政府的作用。
Health Care Manag. 1994 Aug;1(1):1-22.
9
Choosing among health plans.在健康保险计划中进行选择。
Health Care Manag. 1994 Aug;1(1):45-56.
10
Merging managed care with the German model.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1997 Apr-Jun;12(2):115-30. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199704)12:2<115::AID-HPM462>3.0.CO;2-W.