• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重度残疾儿童家庭如何选择分配现金补贴。

How families of children with severe disabilities choose to allocate a cash subsidy.

作者信息

Marcenko M O, Meyers J C

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, Center for the Study of Youth Policy, Philadelphia 19104.

出版信息

J Ment Health Adm. 1994 Summer;21(3):253-61. doi: 10.1007/BF02521332.

DOI:10.1007/BF02521332
PMID:10146070
Abstract

This study examines how families raising children with severe developmental disabilities use a cash subsidy. Eighty-one families were interviewed prior to receiving the $225 monthly subsidy and again 1 year later. Families reported no change in the number of services they used, nor did they significantly increase the amount spent on services. Although families did not spend significantly more on purchases in the month prior to each interview, there was a significant increase in the amount spent on major purchases made in the year after receipt of the subsidy. The pattern and amount of expenditures are described. Lower income families reported the subsidy as significantly more helpful than higher income families. The implications of the findings for social policy are discussed and recommendations are made.

摘要

本研究考察了抚养重度发育障碍儿童的家庭如何使用现金补贴。81个家庭在领取每月225美元补贴之前接受了访谈,一年后再次接受访谈。家庭报告称,他们使用的服务数量没有变化,在服务上的支出也没有显著增加。虽然家庭在每次访谈前一个月的购买支出没有显著增加,但在领取补贴后的一年里,重大购买支出有显著增加。文中描述了支出的模式和金额。低收入家庭报告称补贴比高收入家庭更有帮助。讨论了研究结果对社会政策的影响并提出了建议。

相似文献

1
How families of children with severe disabilities choose to allocate a cash subsidy.重度残疾儿童家庭如何选择分配现金补贴。
J Ment Health Adm. 1994 Summer;21(3):253-61. doi: 10.1007/BF02521332.
2
Impact of a cash subsidy program for families of children with severe developmental disabilities.针对患有严重发育障碍儿童家庭的现金补贴计划的影响
Ment Retard. 1989 Dec;27(6):383-7.
3
Use and impact of a cash subsidy program.
Ment Retard. 1991 Oct;29(5):253-8.
4
Cash subsidy program: family satisfaction and need.
Ment Retard. 1994 Dec;32(6):416-21.
5
A profile of children with disabilities receiving SSI: highlights from the National Survey of SSI Children and Families.领取补充保障收入的残疾儿童概况:来自全国补充保障收入儿童与家庭调查的要点
Soc Secur Bull. 2005;66(2):21-48.
6
Public sector financing of community-based services for children with serious emotional disabilities and their families: results of a national survey.公共部门为患有严重情绪障碍的儿童及其家庭提供基于社区的服务的资金投入:一项全国性调查的结果。
J Ment Health Adm. 1994 Summer;21(3):262-70. doi: 10.1007/BF02521333.
7
Financial burden of raising CSHCN: association with state policy choices.养育有特殊医疗需求儿童的经济负担:与州政策选择的关联。
Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124 Suppl 4:S435-42. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1255P.
8
The TANF/SSI connection.临时援助家庭计划/补充保障收入计划的关联
Soc Secur Bull. 2005;66(4):21-36.
9
Health care for children and youth in the United States: annual report on patterns of coverage, utilization, quality, and expenditures by income.美国儿童和青少年的医疗保健:按收入划分的覆盖范围、利用情况、质量和支出模式年度报告。
Ambul Pediatr. 2005 Jan-Feb;5(1):6-44. doi: 10.1367/A04-119R.1.
10
Health care financing for severe developmental disabilities.
Monogr Am Assoc Ment Retard. 1990(14):1-150.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of selected child characteristics on stress in families of handicapped infants.特定儿童特征对残疾婴儿家庭压力的影响。
Am J Ment Defic. 1983 Sep;88(2):150-6.
2
Family support programs: catalysts for change.家庭支持项目:变革的催化剂
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1989 Jan;59(1):20-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1989.tb01632.x.
3
Impact of a cash subsidy program for families of children with severe developmental disabilities.针对患有严重发育障碍儿童家庭的现金补贴计划的影响
Ment Retard. 1989 Dec;27(6):383-7.
4
Use and impact of a cash subsidy program.
Ment Retard. 1991 Oct;29(5):253-8.
5
Symposium on compliance and quality in residential life. The paradox of regulations: a commentary.
Ment Retard. 1992 Jun;30(3):185-90.
6
The impact of a family-centered case management approach.以家庭为中心的个案管理方法的影响。
Soc Work Health Care. 1992;17(1):87-100. doi: 10.1300/J010v17n01_06.