Cooke J
South Manchester University Hospital NHS Trust, England.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Oct;6(4):289-97. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199406040-00002.
The value of pharmacoeconomics has been advocated by governments and academic establishments worldwide. However, the importance of pharmacoeconomic information to healthcare decision makers will depend upon the viewpoint from which the analysis is conducted. Institutional decision makers are likely to be concerned more with direct than with total costs, and to be influenced more by arguments that apply to the economic effects on the institution than by a societal perspective. Formularies have been employed for a considerable length of time, but their effectiveness has been assessed in terms of cost savings rather than overall value in healthcare outcomes. Many governments and institutions now advocate the importance of contracting for health gain by emphasising the importance of effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. By subjecting treatments to clinical audit, maximum effectiveness can be sought while minimising toxicity and improving compliance with medication through risk management strategies. Pharmacoeconomic evaluations will have maximum impact when there is wide flexibility in the management of resource allocation by virement between different budgets. The consideration of all costs and benefits as parts of a single healthcare budget would satisfy the majority of these needs and maximise the use of healthcare resources.
药物经济学的价值已得到全球各国政府和学术机构的倡导。然而,药物经济学信息对医疗保健决策者的重要性将取决于进行分析的视角。机构决策者可能更关注直接成本而非总成本,并且相比社会视角,更易受到适用于机构经济效应的论据的影响。药品处方集已使用了相当长的时间,但其有效性是根据成本节约而非医疗保健结果的总体价值来评估的。现在,许多政府和机构通过强调治疗干预措施有效性的重要性,倡导为健康收益进行合同约定的重要性。通过对治疗进行临床审核,可以在将毒性降至最低并通过风险管理策略提高药物依从性的同时,寻求最大疗效。当通过不同预算间的资金转移在资源分配管理上具有很大灵活性时,药物经济学评估将产生最大影响。将所有成本和收益视为单一医疗保健预算的一部分来考虑,将满足大多数此类需求,并最大限度地利用医疗保健资源。