• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

被认定无受审能力的被告的住院治疗结果。

Outcome of hospitalization for defendants found incompetent to stand trial.

作者信息

Nicholson R A, McNulty J L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Tulsa, OK 74104.

出版信息

Behav Sci Law. 1992 Summer;10(3):371-83. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2370100307.

DOI:10.1002/bsl.2370100307
PMID:10148855
Abstract

This study assessed the outcome of hospitalization for incompetent criminal defendants admitted to the forensic unit of a state hospital for treatment during a 4-year period. Findings suggested that the overwhelming majority of the defendants were restored to competency. The defendants also showed significant improvement in overall severity of psychopathology during hospitalization. Further, the duration of hospitalization for these defendants was relatively short. Although these results are promising with regard to treatment of incompetent defendants, predicting the outcome of hospitalization for these defendants was problematic. Prediction of competency restoration was precluded because persistent incompetence was so infrequent. Moreover, multiple regression analyses suggested limited predictive ability with regard to defendants' discharge level of functioning or length of hospitalization. These findings are consistent with the view that examiners should exercise caution in making recommendations to the courts concerning treatability of incompetent defendants.

摘要

本研究评估了在四年期间被收治到一家州立医院法医科接受治疗的无行为能力刑事被告的住院治疗结果。研究结果表明,绝大多数被告恢复了行为能力。被告在住院期间精神病理学的总体严重程度也有显著改善。此外,这些被告的住院时间相对较短。虽然这些结果对于无行为能力被告的治疗很有前景,但预测这些被告的住院治疗结果存在问题。由于持续性无行为能力的情况非常罕见,因此无法预测行为能力的恢复。此外,多元回归分析表明,在预测被告出院时的功能水平或住院时间方面,预测能力有限。这些发现与以下观点一致,即检查人员在就无行为能力被告的可治疗性向法院提出建议时应谨慎行事。

相似文献

1
Outcome of hospitalization for defendants found incompetent to stand trial.被认定无受审能力的被告的住院治疗结果。
Behav Sci Law. 1992 Summer;10(3):371-83. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2370100307.
2
Predicting restorability of incompetent criminal defendants.预测无行为能力刑事被告的可恢复性。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2007;35(1):34-43.
3
Predicting treatment outcome for incompetent defendants.预测无行为能力被告的治疗结果。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1994;22(3):367-77.
4
Competency restoration: an examination of the differences between defendants predicted restorable and not restorable to competency.能力恢复:对被预测能够恢复和无法恢复能力的被告之间差异的考察。
Law Hum Behav. 2003 Apr;27(2):127-39. doi: 10.1023/a:1022566328781.
5
Competency Restoration for Adult Defendants in Different Treatment Environments.成人被告在不同治疗环境中的能力恢复。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2019 Mar;47(1):68-81. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003819-19. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
6
Cognition and competency restoration: using the RBANS to predict length of stay for patients deemed incompetent to stand trial.认知和能力恢复:使用 RBANS 预测被认为无能力接受审判的患者的住院时间。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2015;29(1):150-65. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1005678. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
7
A Retrospective Review of the Use of Clozapine in Restoration of Competency to Stand Trial.回顾性分析氯氮平在恢复受审能力中的应用
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2021 Mar;49(1):42-48. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.200051-20. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
8
The role of competency to stand trial in mental health courts.接受审判的能力在心理健康法庭中的作用。
Behav Sci Law. 2005;23(2):245-58. doi: 10.1002/bsl.649.
9
Long-term competence restoration.长期功能恢复。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014;42(1):81-90.
10
Psycholegal abilities and restoration of competence to stand trial.心理法律能力与恢复审判能力。
Behav Sci Law. 2012 Nov-Dec;30(6):710-28. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2040. Epub 2012 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics and re-offending outcomes of 'limiting-term' forensic patients found unfit to stand trial in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州被判定不适合受审的“限期”法医鉴定患者的特征及再次犯罪结果。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 Jan 19;28(5):733-747. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1837032. eCollection 2021.