Suppr超能文献

比较当今冠心病的血运重建策略。溶栓治疗、经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(PTCA)、冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的利弊。

Comparing today's revascularization strategies for CAD. Benefits and drawbacks of thrombolytics, PTCA, CABG.

作者信息

Aranki S F, Cohn L H

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

出版信息

J Crit Illn. 1995 Aug;10(8):523-6, 531-4.

Abstract

A number of factors must be considered when selecting a revascularization strategy for a patient with CAD: Is the patient's condition stable or unstable? How many vessels are affected? What are the benefits and drawbacks of each technique? For patients with an evolving infarction, either thrombolysis or PTCA can achieve early reperfusion. PTCA is also often helpful for those with one- or two-vessel disease; however, restenosis develops in 30% to 50% of patients, usually within 6 months. Although CABG can produce excellent long-term results for patients with three-vessel or left main artery disease and for those with proximal stenosis, the risk of perioperative complications and bypass graft disease remains significant.

摘要

为冠心病患者选择血运重建策略时,必须考虑多个因素:患者病情稳定还是不稳定?有多少支血管受到影响?每种技术的利弊是什么?对于正在发生梗死的患者,溶栓或经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(PTCA)均可实现早期再灌注。PTCA对单支或双支血管病变患者通常也有帮助;然而,30%至50%的患者会发生再狭窄,通常在6个月内。尽管冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)对三支血管或左主干病变患者以及近端狭窄患者可产生优异的长期效果,但围手术期并发症和搭桥血管病变的风险仍然很大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验