• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

How to keep the Joint Commission happy and plaintiff's attorneys frustrated.

作者信息

Trick O L

机构信息

Quality Healthcare Consultants, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Physician Exec. 1995 Dec;21(12):25-8.

PMID:10153007
Abstract

With the first minimum standard by the American College of Surgeons in 1918, the credentialing of physicians became formalized Since those days, in which a physician was basically required to be licensed and of high professional, moral, and ethical character, many requirements have been added. All have been appended for the safety and quality of care of our patients. However, liability attorneys have discovered credentialing requirements and found them a veritable gold mine for litigation. As rapidly as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) offers another standard to help us protect not only our patients but also ourselves in this litigation-bent atmosphere, attorneys engineer a way to bring suit, using the standard as if it were a requirement for prevention of negligence rather than a self-imposed goal for attainment of quality. This article presents a method of credentialing medical staff members that neutralizes the threat of antitrust actions alleging the compromising of livelihood by the denial of membership or clinical privileges. Additionally, the methodology offers maximal protection and integrity of credentialing procedures while optimizing compliance with Joint Commission standards.

摘要

相似文献

1
How to keep the Joint Commission happy and plaintiff's attorneys frustrated.
Physician Exec. 1995 Dec;21(12):25-8.
2
Effective physician credentialing. Properly monitoring medical staffs can protect hospitals from liability.有效的医生资格认证。妥善监督医务人员可以保护医院免受责任追究。
Health Prog. 1990 Nov;71(9):60-5.
3
Duties and potential liability of nonhospital entities in credentialing physicians.
Med Staff Couns. 1991 Winter;5(1):7-17.
4
New JCAH standards affect medical staff, quality assurance.新的医疗组织联合评审委员会标准影响医务人员和质量保证。
Health Prog. 1984 Nov;65(10):38-43.
5
Economic credentialing: your money or your life!经济资格审查:要钱还是要命!
Health Matrix Clevel. 1994 Summer;4(2):325-63.
6
Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply?医务人员特权与反垄断法:公司内部共谋原则是否适用?
Med Staff Couns. 1992 Spring;6(2):9-16.
7
Antitrust implications of allied health practitioner privilege decisions and hospital-physician exclusive contracts.
Med Staff Couns. 1988 Winter;2(1):19-26.
8
JCAHO standards help address disruptive physician behavior.
Physician Exec. 2002 Nov-Dec;28(6):12-3.
9
Beware of human error in CVE (credentials verification entities) reports.谨防CVE(证书验证实体)报告中的人为错误。
Hosp Peer Rev. 1999 Jan;24(1):3-4.
10
Joint Commission's medical staff standards for 2001.联合委员会2001年的医务人员标准。
Health Care Law Mon. 2001 Jan:7-10.