• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将机构认证扩展至医疗评估:澳大利亚的经验。

Extending facility accreditation to the evaluation of care: the Australian experience.

作者信息

Collopy B T

机构信息

ACHS Care Evaluation Program, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Health Plann Manage. 1995 Jul-Sep;10(3):223-9. doi: 10.1002/hpm.4740100308.

DOI:10.1002/hpm.4740100308
PMID:10153239
Abstract

The Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS) has introduced clinical performance measures--clinical indicators--into the accreditation process. The indicators are developed with the assistance of the various medical colleges (professional associations of specialists). Sixteen such bodies are now in the program, with 150 draft indicators covering 90 areas of hospital practice. The development of a set of indicators passes through a number of stages to ensure their validity, and a process is in place to assess their reliability, reproducibility and responsiveness. The qualitative information available indicates a willingness on the part of health care facilities to address the indicators, and alter the process of care. It is anticipated that the quantitative information being collected in aggregate form will subsequently demonstrate an improvement in the outcome of care. Hospital specific information currently remains confidential to the ACHS and the particular health care facility. The public release of such information and the value of doing so remains undetermined.

摘要

澳大利亚医疗保健标准委员会(ACHS)已将临床绩效指标——临床指标引入认证流程。这些指标是在各医学院(专科医生专业协会)的协助下制定的。目前有16个这样的机构参与该项目,有150项指标草案,涵盖医院实践的90个领域。一套指标的制定要经过多个阶段以确保其有效性,并且有一个流程来评估其可靠性、可重复性和响应性。现有定性信息表明,医疗保健机构愿意处理这些指标并改变护理流程。预计以汇总形式收集的定量信息随后将证明护理结果有所改善。目前,医院的具体信息对ACHS和特定的医疗保健机构仍保密。此类信息的公开发布及其价值尚未确定。

相似文献

1
Extending facility accreditation to the evaluation of care: the Australian experience.将机构认证扩展至医疗评估:澳大利亚的经验。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1995 Jul-Sep;10(3):223-9. doi: 10.1002/hpm.4740100308.
2
The Australian development of national quality indicators in health care.澳大利亚医疗保健领域国家质量指标的制定。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1993 Nov;19(11):510-6. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30032-3.
3
The ACHS Care Evaluation Program: a decade of achievement. Australian Council on Healthcare Standards.澳大利亚医疗保健标准委员会的ACHS护理评估项目:十年成就。
J Qual Clin Pract. 2000 Mar;20(1):36-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1762.2000.00346.x.
4
Clinical indicators as a stimulus to QA in hospitals an early report.临床指标作为医院质量保证的刺激因素:一份早期报告
Int J Qual Health Care. 1994 Dec;6(4):331-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/6.4.331.
5
Clinical indicators in accreditation: an effective stimulus to improve patient care.认证中的临床指标:改善患者护理的有效刺激因素。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Jun;12(3):211-6. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/12.3.211.
6
Australian Council on Healthcare Standards surveyor recommendations: analysis of compliance in the medical services.澳大利亚医疗保健标准委员会检查员建议:医疗服务合规情况分析
J Qual Clin Pract. 1994 Sep;14(3):167-72.
7
As it was in the beginning.起初如何,现在依旧。
Aust Clin Rev. 1993;13(3):101-9.
8
The Australian model of hospital accreditation: a discussion.澳大利亚医院评审模式:一场讨论
Aust Health Rev. 1987;10(2):171-8.
9
Accreditation of hospitals in Lebanon: a challenging experience.黎巴嫩医院的认证:一次具有挑战性的经历。
East Mediterr Health J. 2007 Jan-Feb;13(1):138-49.
10
[Accreditation of hospitals. A review of international experiences].[医院认证。国际经验综述]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Sep 16;164(38):4412-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Putting continuous quality improvement into accreditation: improving approaches to quality assessment.将持续质量改进纳入认证:改进质量评估方法。
Qual Health Care. 1997 Dec;6(4):212-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.6.4.212.