• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为何关键的综合医疗服务利益相关者至关重要?评估控制权、联盟、资源与权力。

Why do key integrated delivery stakeholders really matter? Assessing control, coalitions, resources and power.

作者信息

Dymond S, Nix T W, Rotarius T M, Savage G T

机构信息

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA.

出版信息

Med Group Manage J. 1995 Nov-Dec;42(6):26-38.

PMID:10153382
Abstract

This is the fourth in a series of articles describing and interpreting the results from the Facing the Uncertain Future (FUF) study. This article focuses on one vital aspect of strategic stakeholder management: assessment of key stakeholders. Specifically, the article uses Round Two data and presents an assessment of four key medical group practice stakeholders: integrated delivery systems/networks (IDS/Ns), managed care organizations (MCOs), physicians and hospitals. These key stakeholders were identified by medical group practice executives as some of the most important stakeholders in the year 2000. These four stakeholders are assessed on the criteria of organizational control, coalition formation, control of resources, and relative power. The FUF study was conducted jointly between the Center for Research in Ambulatory Health Care Administration (the research and development arm of MGMA), and The Institute for Management and Leadership Research (IMLR), College of Business Administration at Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas. MGMA's American College of Medical Practice Executives, faculty of Texas Tech University's Ph.D. and M.B.A. Programs in Health Organization Management (HOM), and faculty from the University of Alabama at Birmingham collaborated on the project. Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill., provided funding for the FUF project. The administration of Round One was completed in the Fall of 1994. The administration of Round Two was completed in the summer of 1995. Selected Round One and Round Two results have previously been presented in educational programs and publications.

摘要

这是“面对不确定的未来”(FUF)研究系列文章中的第四篇,用于描述和解读研究结果。本文聚焦于战略利益相关者管理的一个关键方面:关键利益相关者评估。具体而言,本文运用第二轮数据,对医疗集团实践的四个关键利益相关者进行评估:综合医疗服务体系/网络(IDS/Ns)、管理式医疗组织(MCOs)、医生和医院。这些关键利益相关者被医疗集团实践管理人员认定为2000年最重要的一些利益相关者。从组织控制、联盟形成、资源控制和相对权力等标准对这四个利益相关者进行评估。FUF研究由门诊医疗保健管理研究中心(MGMA的研发部门)与德克萨斯理工大学卢伯克分校工商管理学院的管理与领导力研究所(IMLR)联合开展。MGMA的美国医疗集团管理执行官学院、德克萨斯理工大学健康组织管理(HOM)博士和工商管理硕士项目的教员以及阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校的教员共同参与了该项目。伊利诺伊州阿伯特帕克的雅培实验室为FUF项目提供了资金。第一轮管理工作于1994年秋季完成。第二轮管理工作于1995年夏季完成。之前已在教育项目和出版物中展示了部分第一轮和第二轮的结果。

相似文献

1
Why do key integrated delivery stakeholders really matter? Assessing control, coalitions, resources and power.为何关键的综合医疗服务利益相关者至关重要?评估控制权、联盟、资源与权力。
Med Group Manage J. 1995 Nov-Dec;42(6):26-38.
2
Strategic choices for medical group practices.医疗集团业务的战略选择
Med Group Manage J. 1996 May-Jun;43(3):32, 34, 36 passim.
3
Strategic stakeholder management. First round results from 'Facing the Uncertain Future'.战略利益相关者管理。“面对不确定的未来”首轮结果
Med Group Manage J. 1995 May-Jun;42(3):16-8, 20-1.
4
Integrated delivery systems/networks in the uncertain future. Strategic stakeholder management, Round One continued.不确定未来中的整合式医疗服务体系/网络。战略利益相关者管理,第一轮续
Med Group Manage J. 1995 Jul-Aug;42(4):22, 24-6, 28 passim.
5
St. Paul PO evolves to meet business coalition's market demands.圣保罗邮局不断发展以满足商业联盟的市场需求。
Med Netw Strategy Rep. 1996 Jan;5(1):5-6.
6
Creating a physician network can pay off--with the right tools.
Manag Care Strateg. 1997 Sep;5(9):97-9.
7
Management services organization for group practices.团体医疗业务的管理服务机构。
J Ambul Care Manage. 1996 Jul;19(3):81-5. doi: 10.1097/00004479-199607000-00009.
8
Provider-sponsored networks.
Russ Coiles Health Trends. 1995 Dec;8(2):1, 3-7.
9
Medical practice and physician executives face the uncertain future. Strategic stakeholder management III.医疗实践和医师管理人员面临着不确定的未来。战略利益相关者管理III。
Med Group Manage J. 1995 Sep-Oct;42(5):36, 38-43, 76-8.
10
Overview of alternatives for clinical integration.临床整合替代方案概述。
Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1998 Summer;38(3):1-15. doi: 10.1097/00004397-199803830-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of network type exchange in the health care system: a stakeholder approach.分析医疗保健系统中的网络类型交换:利益相关者方法。
J Med Syst. 2012 Jun;36(3):1569-81. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9618-5. Epub 2010 Nov 3.