Suppr超能文献

评估医师门诊:寻求有效且可靠的质量改进成效衡量方法。

Evaluating the physician office visit: in pursuit of a valid and reliable measure of quality improvement efforts.

作者信息

Seibert J H, Strohmeyer J M, Carey R G

机构信息

Parkside Associates, Inc., Park Ridge, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Ambul Care Manage. 1996 Jan;19(1):17-37.

Abstract

In an effort to develop a patient questionnaire with sufficient validity and reliability to be used to measure patient perceptions of quality, over 30,000 patients from 178 solo and group practices completed the Physician Office Quality of Care Monitor (QCM). The study found strong evidence of construct validity, predictive validity, and internal consistency for the questionnaire. Physician interactions were the most important aspect of office care while coordination of care over time was found to be the best issue to differentiate patients likely to recommend a practice from those less likely to recommend. An inverse relationship was found between practice size and patient satisfaction. Health maintenance organization (HMO) patients reported lower satisfaction, as did younger patients.

摘要

为了开发一份具有足够效度和信度的患者问卷,以用于衡量患者对医疗质量的看法,来自178个单人诊所和团体诊所的30000多名患者完成了《医师办公室医疗质量监测问卷》(QCM)。该研究发现,该问卷在结构效度、预测效度和内部一致性方面有强有力的证据。医师互动是门诊医疗中最重要的方面,而长期的医疗协调被发现是区分可能推荐该诊所的患者和不太可能推荐的患者的最佳因素。研究发现诊所规模与患者满意度之间存在反比关系。健康维护组织(HMO)的患者报告的满意度较低,年轻患者也是如此。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验