Suppr超能文献

新疗法经济评估中的方法学问题。以集落刺激因子为例。

Methodological issues in economic assessments of new therapies. The case of colony-stimulating factors.

作者信息

Drummond M, Menzin J, Oster G

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, England.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 1994;6 Suppl 2:18-26. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199400062-00005.

Abstract

Pharmacoeconomic evaluations estimate the value of medical interventions by comparing their clinical consequences and costs. Economic analyses, based on resource use data collected during 3 clinical trials of lenograstim, were performed as part of a lenograstim economic evaluation programme. Undertaking economic evaluations alongside clinical trials presents a number of methodological challenges, since the trials may be performed in atypical settings, have inappropriate follow-up, or use end-points that are not useful for economic evaluation. This paper reports on how these challenges were met in the lenograstim economic evaluation programme. In particular, it was decided that the evaluations would be based on an intent-to-treat perspective, with the same period of follow-up (for costs) for both lenograstim and vehicle groups.

摘要

药物经济学评估通过比较医疗干预措施的临床效果和成本来估算其价值。基于在三项重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(lenograstim)临床试验期间收集的资源使用数据进行的经济分析,是lenograstim经济评估计划的一部分。在临床试验的同时进行经济评估存在一些方法学上的挑战,因为试验可能在非典型环境中进行,随访不合适,或者使用对经济评估无用的终点指标。本文报告了在lenograstim经济评估计划中如何应对这些挑战。特别是,决定评估将基于意向性治疗的观点,lenograstim组和赋形剂组的随访期(成本方面)相同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验