• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Ideological influence in U.S. health policy: catalysts or impediments?

作者信息

Wong J D

机构信息

Wichita State University, USA.

出版信息

J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1995 Fall;18(2):205-25.

PMID:10157321
Abstract

Although pronouncements of the ¿health care crisis¿ have been made for thirty years, in many ways the fundamental underpinnings of the U.S. health care system have changed very little. However, calls for health care reform have progressed through four distinct phases. From before the 1965 passage of the Medicare and Medicaid programs until about 1972, the primary issue was expanding access to care. From 1972 through 1976, health care reform proposals experienced a transition period. From 1976 until about 1992, cost containment became the dominant theme. Since 1992 there has been a renewed emphasis on improving access to care. But Americans have mixed feelings about health care reform. On the one hand, Americans want improved access to care, increased efficiency, and high quality care. On the other hand, Americans are leery of higher taxes and expanding the government's role in health care decision-making. In the final analysis, it is ultimately politics which governs the form of health care reform by effecting compromises between what is ideologically desirable and what is economically plausible.

摘要

相似文献

1
Ideological influence in U.S. health policy: catalysts or impediments?
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1995 Fall;18(2):205-25.
2
Healthcare reform: current and proposed approaches.医疗保健改革:当前及提议的方法。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1994 Aug;21(7):1215-20.
3
Why U.S. health care reform is so difficult.为何美国医疗保健改革如此艰难。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1994 Sep-Oct;24(5):23-5.
4
Obama health care for all Americans: practical implications.奥巴马全民医保:实际影响。
Pain Physician. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):289-304.
5
Putting people first: health care our families can afford.以人为本:提供我们家庭能够负担得起的医疗保健。
J Am Health Policy. 1992 Sep-Oct;2(5):17, 19, 21 passim.
6
The impact of market-based 'reform' on cultural values in health care.基于市场的“改革”对医疗保健文化价值观的影响。
Semin Nurse Manag. 1999 Dec;7(4):198-202.
7
Inequality and access to health care.医疗保健的不平等与可及性。
Milbank Q. 1991;69(2):253-73.
8
Health care systems in Japan and Germany provide facts, not theories.
J Med Assoc Ga. 1993 Dec;82(12):651-5.
9
Health care reform: what Americans want.医疗保健改革:美国人想要什么。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 Dec;6(12):831. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.09.010.
10
U.S. health care in conflict--Part I. The challenges of balancing cost, quality and access.美国医疗保健陷入冲突——第一部分。平衡成本、质量和可及性的挑战。
Physician Exec. 2002 Jul-Aug;28(4):43-7.