Suppr超能文献

戒烟的电话咨询:理论依据与证据的荟萃分析综述

Telephone counseling for smoking cessation: rationales and meta-analytic review of evidence.

作者信息

Lichtenstein E, Glasgow R E, Lando H A, Ossip-Klein D J, Boles S M

机构信息

Oregon Research Institute, Eugene 97403, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 1996 Jun;11(2):243-57. doi: 10.1093/her/11.2.243.

Abstract

We review the various ways in which telephone counseling has been used in smoking cessation programs. Reactive approaches--help lines or crisis lines--attract only a small percentage of eligible smokers but are sensitive to promotional campaigns. While difficult to evaluate, they appear to be efficacious and useful as a public intervention for large populations. Proactive phone counseling has been used in a variety of ways. In 13 randomized trials, most showed significant short-term (3-6 month) effects, and four found substantial long-term differences between intervention and control conditions. A meta-analysis of proactive studies using a best-evidence synthesis confirmed a significant increase in cessation rates compared with control conditions [pooled odds ratios of 1.34 (1.19-1.51) and 1.20 (1.06-1.37) at short- and long-term follow-up, respectively]. Proactive phone counseling appeared most effective when used as the sole intervention modality or when augmenting programs initiated in hospital settings. Suggestions for further research and utilization are offered.

摘要

我们回顾了电话咨询在戒烟项目中的各种应用方式。反应性方法——帮助热线或危机热线——仅吸引了一小部分符合条件的吸烟者,但对宣传活动很敏感。虽然难以评估,但它们似乎作为一种针对大量人群的公共干预措施是有效且有用的。主动性电话咨询有多种应用方式。在13项随机试验中,大多数显示出显著的短期(3 - 6个月)效果,有4项发现干预组和对照组在长期存在实质性差异。一项使用最佳证据综合法对主动性研究进行的荟萃分析证实,与对照组相比,戒烟率有显著提高[短期和长期随访时的合并优势比分别为1.34(1.19 - 1.51)和1.20(1.06 - 1.37)]。当作为唯一的干预方式或用于加强在医院环境中启动的项目时,主动性电话咨询似乎最有效。文中还提供了进一步研究和应用的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验