Weil T P, Brenner G
Bedford Health Associates, Inc., Asheville, NC, USA.
J Ambul Care Manage. 1997 Jan;20(1):77-91. doi: 10.1097/00004479-199701000-00009.
The Germany multipayer universal health insurance plan in 1992 consumed 8.7% of its nation's total expenditures. Nevertheless, its macromanaged approach has allowed until recently for pluralism, decentralization, and self-regulation among providers and sickness funds (not-for-profit, third party payers). With 34.8% more physicians per 1,000 persons, German doctors provided twice as many patient contacts per capita than in the United States. Due to economic constraints and increases in payroll taxes, the Federal Republic of Germany's parliament, with its 1993 health reform plan, virtually froze all payments to providers for a 3-year period. Among other contentious provisions were the following: (1) limiting the entry of new physicians into municipalities that are considered by government health manpower planning experts to be oversupplied in that specialty; (2) requiring community-based physicians to participate in controlling pharmaceutical costs; and (3) eliminating some of the German traditional barriers between their in- and out-of-hospital physicians. This article focuses on how the Germans now micromanage their physician and other ambulatory care services within a macromanaged system that, in terms of patient access, benefits, quality, and cost, should be the envy of the Americans.
1992年,德国的多支付方全民医疗保险计划耗费了该国总支出的8.7%。然而,其宏观管理模式直到最近仍允许医疗服务提供者和疾病基金(非营利性第三方支付方)之间存在多元化、分散化和自我监管。德国每千人拥有的医生数量比美国多34.8%,德国医生人均提供的患者诊疗次数是美国的两倍。由于经济限制和工资税增加,德意志联邦共和国议会在其1993年的医疗改革计划中,实际上冻结了对医疗服务提供者为期3年的所有支付。其他有争议的条款包括:(1)限制新医生进入政府医疗卫生人力规划专家认为该专业供应过剩的城市;(2)要求社区医生参与控制药品成本;(3)消除德国医院内外医生之间的一些传统障碍。本文重点关注德国人如今如何在一个宏观管理体系内对其医生及其他门诊护理服务进行微观管理,就患者就医机会、福利、质量和成本而言,这个体系理应让美国人羡慕。