• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何避免盲目行事。要真正改善美国的医疗保健,领导者必须考虑七种道德价值观。

How to avoid flying blind. To truly improve U.S. healthcare, leaders must consider seven moral values.

作者信息

Dougherty C J

机构信息

Creighton University, Omaha, NE, USA.

出版信息

Health Prog. 1997 Mar-Apr;78(2):20-2.

PMID:10166693
Abstract

To genuinely improve U.S. healthcare, we must base it on seven moral values familiar to Americans: Preserving individual dignity. Patients have a right to information about their medical condition and a right to participate in decisions about treatment. Society should make a basic package of healthcare available to all who need it. Caring for patients' welfare. As providers are obliged to have compassion for patients' suffering, they should also put patients' interests above their own and avoid conflicts of interest. Protecting the least well-off. Many who are poor, less educated, or members of racial or ethnic minorities bear disproportionate burdens of morbidity and mortality. They should receive care that compensates for those disadvantages. Seeking the common good. Our society has a strong disposition toward excessive individualism. We need greater emphasis on public health and preventive measures, as well as more opportunities for the public to help shape the healthcare system. Containing the healthcare costs. Waste is offensive both economically and morally. We can contain costs only by grappling explicitly with the need for healthcare rationing, which should be applied according to ethical criteria. Retaining a sense of responsibility. Society can help renew a sense of responsibility b anchoring it in the concept of subsidiarity, according to which the best government is the least government necessary to perform its appropriate tasks. Establishing high standards of quality. Providers should pursue excellence as measured by improved medical outcomes, uniform use of appropriate procedures, and increased consumer satisfaction. Quality-of-life judgments can be useful in making healthcare decisions, especially for persons who are dying.

摘要

要真正改善美国的医疗保健体系,我们必须以美国人熟悉的七种道德价值观为基础:维护个人尊严。患者有权了解自己的病情,有权参与治疗决策。社会应为所有有需要的人提供基本的医疗保健服务。关心患者福祉。由于医疗服务提供者有义务同情患者的痛苦,他们也应将患者的利益置于自身利益之上,并避免利益冲突。保护最弱势群体。许多穷人、受教育程度较低者或少数种族或族裔成员承受着不成比例的发病和死亡负担。他们应获得能够弥补这些不利因素的医疗服务。追求共同利益。我们的社会强烈倾向于过度个人主义。我们需要更加重视公共卫生和预防措施,以及为公众提供更多机会来塑造医疗保健体系。控制医疗成本。浪费在经济和道德上都是令人厌恶的。我们只有通过明确应对医疗资源分配的必要性才能控制成本,而这种分配应依据道德标准进行。保持责任感。社会可以通过将责任感建立在辅助性原则的概念上来帮助恢复这种责任感,根据这一原则,最好的政府是履行其适当任务所需的最少政府。建立高质量标准。医疗服务提供者应追求卓越,这可以通过改善医疗结果、统一使用适当程序以及提高消费者满意度来衡量。生活质量判断在做出医疗保健决策时可能会很有用,尤其是对于临终患者。

相似文献

1
How to avoid flying blind. To truly improve U.S. healthcare, leaders must consider seven moral values.如何避免盲目行事。要真正改善美国的医疗保健,领导者必须考虑七种道德价值观。
Health Prog. 1997 Mar-Apr;78(2):20-2.
2
Toward a just healthcare system.迈向公正的医疗体系。
Health Prog. 1992 May;73(4):32-6.
3
Catholic healthcare as "leaven". To penetrate and renew society, Catholic healthcare must meet five requirements.天主教医疗作为“酵母”。为了渗透并革新社会,天主教医疗必须满足五个要求。
Health Prog. 1997 Mar-Apr;78(2):34-8, 43.
4
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
5
A dynamic force for change. The common good provides the rationale for a healthcare system for all.变革的动力。共同利益为全民医疗保健系统提供了理论依据。
Health Prog. 1997 Mar-Apr;78(2):31-3, 42.
6
The courtship of the paying patient.付费患者的求爱行为。 (注:此翻译需结合具体语境来准确理解其确切含义,“courtship”原意为求爱、求婚等,这里结合“付费患者”这样的语境,可能表示类似吸引付费患者的行为等意思 )
J Clin Ethics. 1993 Summer;4(2):124-33.
7
The impact of market-based 'reform' on cultural values in health care.基于市场的“改革”对医疗保健文化价值观的影响。
Semin Nurse Manag. 1999 Dec;7(4):198-202.
8
The right to a decent minimum of health care.享有基本体面医疗保健的权利。
Philos Public Aff. 1984 Winter;13(1):55-78.
9
Containing health care costs: ethical and legal implications of changes in the methods of paying physicians.控制医疗保健成本:医生支付方式变化的伦理和法律影响
Case West Reserve Law Rev. 1985;36(4):708-77.
10
Institutional ethics committees as social justice advocates.作为社会正义倡导者的机构伦理委员会。
Health Prog. 1984 Oct;65(9):32-5, 56.