Schweitzer M E, Hershey J C
Management Department, University of Miami, FL, USA.
Benefits Q. 1997;13(2):36-46.
Results from this work describe 239 responses to a mailed survey regarding employee benefits decisions at a large eastern university. The primary objective of this work is to test for an undercontribution bias in health care financing decisions. The results establish the existence of an undercontribution bias in both actual employee decisions and hypothetical flexible spending account contribution decisions. We describe this bias within the context of related biases including loss aversion, mental accounting, status quo and omission biases. Surprisingly, we find a significant order effect in this study and posit that preference construction in this context is an active, reference-dependent process. In addition, results from this work demonstrate the endogenous nature of health care flexible spending account expenditures. The results have important implications both for the descriptive framework of and the normative solution to the flexible spending account contribution decision.
这项工作的结果描述了对一所东部大型大学员工福利决策的邮寄调查的239份回复。这项工作的主要目标是测试医疗保健融资决策中的缴费不足偏差。结果表明,在实际员工决策和假设的弹性支出账户缴费决策中都存在缴费不足偏差。我们在包括损失厌恶、心理账户、现状偏差和遗漏偏差等相关偏差的背景下描述了这种偏差。令人惊讶的是,我们在这项研究中发现了显著的顺序效应,并认为在这种情况下偏好构建是一个积极的、依赖参考的过程。此外,这项工作的结果证明了医疗保健弹性支出账户支出的内生性质。这些结果对弹性支出账户缴费决策的描述框架和规范解决方案都具有重要意义。