• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

圣达菲医疗服务提供商网络未受到美国司法部的质疑。

Santa Fe provider network goes unchallenged by the DOJ.

作者信息

Busey R C

机构信息

Gardner Carton & Douglas, Chicago, IL., USA.

出版信息

Healthc Financ Manage. 1997 May;51(5):86-7.

PMID:10167301
Abstract

After careful consideration of possible anticompetitive harm and payer reaction, the Department of Justice has chosen not to challenge as unlawful a provider-controlled, nonexclusive physician network in Santa Fe, New Mexico, even though the network will include 70 percent of the area's pediatricians. Reasons for the DOJ's decision include evidence of substantial risk sharing by the physician members, an arrangement by the network to provide a different compensation system for non-member participating physicians, and the pediatricians' promise that they will participate in the network on a nonexclusive basis. In addition, the member pediatricians will be a small minority of the primary care physicians whose compensation will be paid out of one fixed revenue pool. The DOJ's decision thus signals support for a provider network model for smaller communities.

摘要

在仔细考虑了可能的反竞争危害和付款方的反应后,美国司法部决定不对新墨西哥州圣达菲市一个由医疗服务提供者控制的非独家医生网络提出非法质疑,尽管该网络将涵盖该地区70%的儿科医生。美国司法部做出这一决定的原因包括:医生成员有大量风险分担的证据、该网络为非成员参与医生提供不同薪酬体系的安排,以及儿科医生承诺将以非独家方式参与该网络。此外,成员儿科医生将只是少数,而这些初级保健医生的薪酬将从一个固定收入池中支出。因此,美国司法部的这一决定表明其支持为较小社区建立的医疗服务提供者网络模式。

相似文献

1
Santa Fe provider network goes unchallenged by the DOJ.圣达菲医疗服务提供商网络未受到美国司法部的质疑。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1997 May;51(5):86-7.
2
Revised antitrust guidelines. Forming physician network joint ventures.修订后的反垄断指南。组建医生网络合资企业。
Physician Exec. 1997 Feb;23(2):24-6.
3
Revised DOJ and FTC policy statements offer more options for physician joint ventures.
Healthc Financ Manage. 1996 Nov;50(11):79-80, 82.
4
The 1996 Justice Department/FTC statements on physician joint ventures and multiprovider organizations.1996年美国司法部/联邦贸易委员会关于医生合资企业和多提供者组织的声明。
Med Interface. 1997 Feb;10(2):103-6.
5
Interpreting the 1996 federal antitrust guidelines for physician joint venture networks.
Ann Health Law. 1997;6:1-49.
6
Government agencies soften stance on what constitutes price fixing.政府机构对价格操纵的构成要素的立场有所软化。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1997 Feb;51(2):27-9.
7
Antitrust developments: justice proposes consent decrees with PHOs.
J Cardiovasc Manag. 1995 Nov-Dec;6(6):14, 16.
8
Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission issue further guidance relating to physician network joint ventures.
Benders Health Care Law Mon. 1996 Oct:3-4.
9
The legal framework for effective competition.有效竞争的法律框架。
Baxter Health Policy Rev. 1996;2:235-65.
10
Do physicians need relief from antitrust laws?
Mark Health Serv. 1997 Summer;17(2):45-9.