Ubokudom S E
Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of Toledo, OH 43606, USA.
Health Policy. 1997 Aug;41(2):139-56. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(97)00018-3.
This study was designed to identify the factors that enhance and impede physician participation in a Medicaid managed care program, the Kansas Primary Care Network (PCN). The data for the study were collected in the summer of 1993 through a mail survey of primary care physicians in the PCN service area. Logistic regression and cross tabular analytic techniques were employed for data analysis. The results indicate that physicians who are not receptive to capitation-based reimbursement practices, those who practice in the higher per capita income counties, those who do not compare the PCN reimbursement rates favorably with private insurance rates, and physicians who think that untimely payment and the requirement to document patient referrals for specialty treatment pose problems for them are less likely to participate in the PCN program. Further, the study shows that institutional physicians have larger Medicaid caseloads than solo practitioners, who have larger Medicaid caseloads than single-specialty and multi-specialty group practitioners. Since most of the variables that attain statistical significance in explaining physician participation in the PCN program have to do with money, the study reaffirms the two market theory of the United States' health care delivery system.
本研究旨在确定促进和阻碍医生参与堪萨斯初级保健网络(PCN)这一医疗补助管理式医疗计划的因素。该研究的数据于1993年夏季通过对PCN服务区域内的初级保健医生进行邮件调查收集。数据分析采用了逻辑回归和交叉列表分析技术。结果表明,那些不接受基于人头费的报销做法的医生、那些在人均收入较高的县执业的医生、那些认为PCN报销率不如私人保险率优惠的医生,以及那些认为付款不及时和要求记录患者转诊至专科治疗存在问题的医生,参与PCN计划的可能性较小。此外,研究表明,机构医生的医疗补助病例量比个体执业医生大,个体执业医生的医疗补助病例量比单专科和多专科团体执业医生大。由于在解释医生参与PCN计划方面具有统计学意义的大多数变量都与金钱有关,该研究重申了美国医疗保健提供系统的双市场理论。