Suppr超能文献

隆胸植入物面临困境:历史评论

Breast implants under siege: an historical commentary.

作者信息

Fisher J C, Brody G S

机构信息

University of California at San Diego Medical Center 92103.

出版信息

J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1992;1(3):243-53.

Abstract

Despite 3 decades of rapidly expanding application of polydimethylsiloxane as a relatively safe implantable biomaterial, the American public is being told by a vocal minority that its use in the breast implant may be dangerous. Most of the furor has been generated by consumer advocates with support of a handful of scientists who have expressed opinions, not well supported by facts, about the risks of these devices. These anxieties have been fueled in the public's mind by a media more interested in sensationalism than disciplined reporting. The controversy has complicated the regulatory process and has become politicized in the halls of State Legislatures and Congress. Remarkably, this controversy has not involved the many other biomedical applications of silicone. How has this controversy gathered momentum? What role has the government played and how have the professional, scientific, corporate, and patient communities responded to public concern? This discussion places the breast implant battle into an historical perspective.

摘要

尽管聚二甲基硅氧烷作为一种相对安全的可植入生物材料已迅速广泛应用了三十年,但一小部分人却向美国公众宣称,其用于乳房植入物可能存在危险。这场轩然大波大多是由消费者权益倡导者引发的,他们得到了一些科学家的支持,这些科学家表达了关于这些器械风险的观点,但缺乏事实依据。媒体更热衷于耸人听闻而非严谨报道,这在公众心中加剧了这些焦虑。这场争议使监管过程变得复杂,并在州立法机构和国会大厅中被政治化。值得注意的是,这场争议并未涉及硅酮在许多其他生物医学方面的应用。这场争议是如何愈演愈烈的呢?政府扮演了什么角色?专业人士、科学界、企业界和患者群体又是如何回应公众关切的呢?本讨论将乳房植入物之争置于历史背景中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验