• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

养老院的激励性监管。

Incentive regulation of nursing homes.

作者信息

Norton E C

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 1992 Aug;11(2):105-28. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(92)90030-5.

DOI:10.1016/0167-6296(92)90030-5
PMID:10171309
Abstract

A social experiment was conducted in San Diego to test the effectiveness of monetary incentives in improving the health of nursing home residents and lowering Medicaid expenditures. Use of a Markov model to represent the resulting health changes of nursing home residents shows that the monetary incentives had beneficial effects on both the quality and the cost of nursing home care. Moreover, the nursing homes admitted more people with severe disabilities, and the average length of their stays was shortened. If implemented, this kind of incentive program would save Medicaid substantial amounts of money, but not through lowering nursing home payments. Instead, the more efficient use of nursing homes would transfer more people out of hospitals and thereby save unnecessary hospital reimbursement.

摘要

在圣地亚哥进行了一项社会实验,以测试金钱激励措施在改善养老院居民健康状况和降低医疗补助支出方面的有效性。使用马尔可夫模型来表示养老院居民由此产生的健康变化,结果表明金钱激励措施对养老院护理的质量和成本都有有益影响。此外,养老院接收了更多重度残疾的人,并且他们的平均住院时间缩短了。如果实施这种激励计划,将为医疗补助节省大量资金,但不是通过降低养老院费用来实现。相反,更有效地利用养老院将使更多人从医院转出,从而节省不必要的医院报销费用。

相似文献

1
Incentive regulation of nursing homes.养老院的激励性监管。
J Health Econ. 1992 Aug;11(2):105-28. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(92)90030-5.
2
Incentive payments to nursing homes based on quality-of-care outcomes.根据护理质量结果向养老院支付激励款项。
J Appl Gerontol. 1992 Jun;11(2):131-45. doi: 10.1177/073346489201100201.
3
Nursing home performance under case-mix reimbursement: responding to heavy-care incentives and market changes.按病例组合报销制度下的养老院绩效:应对重症护理激励措施和市场变化。
Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct;33(4 Pt 1):815-34.
4
Do financial incentives influence the hospitalization rate of nursing home residents? Evidence from Germany.经济激励是否会影响养老院居民的住院率?来自德国的证据。
Health Econ. 2019 Nov;28(11):1235-1247. doi: 10.1002/hec.3930. Epub 2019 Sep 15.
5
The effect of pay-for-performance in nursing homes: evidence from state Medicaid programs.养老院按绩效付费的效果:来自州医疗补助计划的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug;48(4):1393-414. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12035. Epub 2013 Feb 10.
6
Nursing home reimbursement: implications for cost containment, access, and quality.养老院报销:对成本控制、可及性和质量的影响。
Milbank Q. 1987;65(1):112-47.
7
Interstate variation in elderly Medicaid nursing home populations. Comparisons of resident characteristics and medical care utilization.老年医疗补助计划疗养院人口的州际差异。居民特征与医疗服务利用情况的比较。
Med Care. 1987 Aug;25(8):738-52. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198708000-00007.
8
The limits of Medicaid reimbursement incentives. An evaluation of the Florida AIDS Nursing Home Admission Program.医疗补助报销激励措施的局限性。对佛罗里达州艾滋病疗养院入院项目的评估。
Eval Health Prof. 1996 Dec;19(4):443-64. doi: 10.1177/016327879601900405.
9
The effect of Medicaid reimbursement on quality of care in nursing homes.医疗补助报销对疗养院护理质量的影响。
J Health Econ. 1996 Feb;15(1):23-48. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(95)00030-5.
10
Cost savings from home and community-based services: Arizona's capitated Medicaid long-term care program.家庭和社区服务带来的成本节约:亚利桑那州的按人头付费医疗补助长期护理项目。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1997 Dec;22(6):1329-57. doi: 10.1215/03616878-22-6-1329.

引用本文的文献

1
Paying for Nursing Home Quality: An Elusive But Important Goal.为养老院质量买单:一个难以实现但重要的目标。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Feb;71(2):342-348. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18260.
2
Political economy analysis of the performance-based financing programme in Afghanistan.阿富汗绩效融资计划的政治经济学分析。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2021 Mar 10;6(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s41256-021-00191-6.
3
Do report cards predict future quality? The case of skilled nursing facilities.绩效报告能否预测未来质量?以熟练护理设施为例。
J Health Econ. 2019 Jul;66:208-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 24.
4
The association between client characteristics and recovery in California's comprehensive community mental health programs.加州综合性社区心理健康项目中客户特征与康复之间的关联。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Oct;103(10):e89-95. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301233. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
5
Culture change practice in U.S. Nursing homes: prevalence and variation by state medicaid reimbursement policies.美国养老院的文化变革实践:按州医疗补助报销政策划分的患病率及差异
Gerontologist. 2014 Jun;54(3):434-45. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt020. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
6
The effect of pay-for-performance in nursing homes: evidence from state Medicaid programs.养老院按绩效付费的效果:来自州医疗补助计划的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug;48(4):1393-414. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12035. Epub 2013 Feb 10.
7
Relating illness complexity to reimbursement in CKD patients.将疾病复杂性与慢性肾脏病患者的报销相关联。
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2011;4:121-30. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S24361. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
8
Economic evaluation of pay-for-performance in health care: a systematic review.医疗保健绩效付费的经济评价:系统评价。
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Dec;13(6):755-67. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0329-8. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
9
Modeling transition rates using panel current-status data: how serious is the bias?使用面板当前状态数据对转移率进行建模:偏差有多严重?
Demography. 2009 May;46(2):371-86. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0057.
10
Using the lessons of behavioral economics to design more effective pay-for-performance programs.利用行为经济学的经验教训来设计更有效的按绩效付费计划。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jul;16(7):497-503.