• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院护理中的容量与结果:证据、解释及影响

Volume and outcome in hospital care: evidence, explanations and implications.

作者信息

Black N, Johnston A

机构信息

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

出版信息

Health Serv Manage Res. 1990 Jul;3(2):108-14. doi: 10.1177/095148489000300205.

DOI:10.1177/095148489000300205
PMID:10171409
Abstract

The relationship between the volume of work undertaken in a hospital and the outcome of care has assumed increasing importance in recent years. A review of the literature reveals that most studies have been carried out in the USA and have largely been confined to six specific areas of health care. There is evidence that better outcomes are obtained at higher volumes for several surgical operations, cardiac catheterisation and care of the severely injured. As yet there is no clear association for coronary, neo-natal and burn care. There are two competing hypotheses to explain any association -- 'practice-makes-perfect' and 'selective referral'. These are discussed and implications for the future provision of hospital services considered.

摘要

近年来,医院的工作量与护理结果之间的关系变得越来越重要。对文献的回顾显示,大多数研究是在美国进行的,并且主要局限于六个特定的医疗保健领域。有证据表明,在一些外科手术、心脏导管插入术和重伤护理方面,工作量越大,结果越好。然而,对于冠心病、新生儿护理和烧伤护理,目前尚无明确的关联。有两种相互竞争的假说来解释这种关联——“熟能生巧”和“选择性转诊”。本文将对这两种假说进行讨论,并探讨其对未来医院服务提供的影响。

相似文献

1
Volume and outcome in hospital care: evidence, explanations and implications.医院护理中的容量与结果:证据、解释及影响
Health Serv Manage Res. 1990 Jul;3(2):108-14. doi: 10.1177/095148489000300205.
2
A county hospital surgical practice: a model for acute care surgery.一家县级医院的外科实践:急性护理手术的一个典范
Am J Surg. 2007 Dec;194(6):758-63; discussion 763-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.019.
3
[High-risk surgery should not be performed in hospitals with low surgical volume].高风险手术不应在手术量低的医院进行。
Lakartidningen. 2004 Aug 5;101(32-33):2494-5.
4
Variation in outcome of surgical procedures.
Br J Surg. 1994 May;81(5):653-60. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810508.
5
The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns?容量-结局关系:熟能生巧还是选择性转诊模式?
Health Serv Res. 1987 Jun;22(2):157-82.
6
[A report on quality of surgical treatment: no evidence of the fact that bigger hospitals are better than small ones].一份关于外科治疗质量的报告:没有证据表明大医院比小医院更好。
Lakartidningen. 1995 Oct 4;92(40):3646.
7
Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures.新的“跳蛙”标准的潜在益处:过程与结果指标的影响
Surgery. 2004 Jun;135(6):569-75. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.03.004.
8
Staffing in postnatal units: is it adequate for the provision of quality care? Staff perspectives from a state-wide review of postnatal care in Victoria, Australia.产后病房的人员配备:是否足以提供优质护理?来自澳大利亚维多利亚州全州产后护理审查的工作人员观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul 4;6:83. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-83.
9
The effects of surgical volumes and training centre status on outcomes following total joint replacement: analysis of the Hospital Episode Statistics for England.手术量和培训中心状态对全关节置换术后结局的影响:基于英格兰医院事件统计数据的分析
J Public Health (Oxf). 2006 Jun;28(2):116-24. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdl003. Epub 2006 Apr 5.
10
Procedural volume as a marker of quality for CABG surgery.冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)手术的操作量作为质量指标。
JAMA. 2004 Jan 14;291(2):195-201. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.2.195.

引用本文的文献

1
The rationale for a spine registry.脊柱登记处的基本原理。
Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S52-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1050-z. Epub 2005 Nov 16.
2
Evidence-based appraisal of antireflux fundoplication.抗反流胃底折叠术的循证评估
Ann Surg. 2004 Mar;239(3):325-37. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000114225.46280.fe.
3
Mortality league tables: do they inform or mislead?死亡率排行榜:它们是提供信息还是误导?
Qual Health Care. 1995 Mar;4(1):5-12. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.1.5.
4
Measuring hospital performance: are we asking the right questions?衡量医院绩效:我们问对问题了吗?
J R Soc Med. 1997 Apr;90(4):187-91. doi: 10.1177/014107689709000403.
5
Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care.为什么我们需要观察性研究来评估医疗保健的有效性。
BMJ. 1996 May 11;312(7040):1215-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7040.1215.
6
Volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: true association or artefact?冠状动脉搭桥手术中的手术量与预后:真实关联还是人为因素?
BMJ. 1995 Jul 15;311(6998):151-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6998.151.
7
Paediatricians and the new National Health Service.儿科医生与新的国民医疗服务体系。
Arch Dis Child. 1991 Mar;66(3):357-60. doi: 10.1136/adc.66.3.357.
8
Paediatric nephrology on the threshold of European integration.欧洲一体化门槛上的儿科肾脏病学。
Pediatr Nephrol. 1991 Jul;5(4):428-32. doi: 10.1007/BF01453672.
9
Management and information.管理与信息
BMJ. 1992 Mar 7;304(6827):632-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6827.632.