Jerrell J M, Hu T W, Ridgely M S
Department of Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia 29203.
J Ment Health Adm. 1994 Summer;21(3):283-97. doi: 10.1007/BF02521335.
This study examines the cost effectiveness of three intervention strategies for people with severe mental illness who are dually diagnosed clients in terms of service use and costs. The interventions represent three primary approaches to treating these disorders: 12-step recovery, case management, and behavioral skills training. Interim findings from the study indicate that all three approaches are reducing acute and subacute service use and increasing involvement with outpatient and case management treatments. However, both the case management and behavioral skills approaches reduce costs more than the 12-step recovery approach, although not to a statistically significant degree in the data collected thus far. Overall, the societal costs for these clients are reduced by 43% without increasing the burden on client families or on the criminal justice system.
本研究从服务使用和成本方面,考察了针对患有严重精神疾病且同时患有其他疾病的患者的三种干预策略的成本效益。这些干预措施代表了治疗这些疾病的三种主要方法:12步康复法、病例管理和行为技能培训。该研究的中期结果表明,所有这三种方法都在减少急性和亚急性服务的使用,并增加了门诊治疗和病例管理治疗的参与度。然而,病例管理和行为技能方法比12步康复法降低成本的幅度更大,尽管在目前收集的数据中,尚未达到统计学上的显著程度。总体而言,这些患者的社会成本降低了43%,同时没有增加患者家庭或刑事司法系统的负担。