• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

界定一段护理过程:对五种病例类型的研究

Defining an episode of care: a study of five case types.

作者信息

Eagar K

机构信息

Centre of Health Service Development, University of Wollongong.

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 1997;20(3):105-19. doi: 10.1071/ah970105.

DOI:10.1071/ah970105
PMID:10173694
Abstract

This is the first study in Australia to test definitions of various types of 'episodes of care'. The definitions reported here are those used in the 1996 National Sub-Acute and Non-Acute Patient (SNAP) Casemix Classification Study. The study collected data on a total of 683 patients at 10 hospitals and 2 community health services providing a range of rehabilitation, aged care and community care services. The kappa statistic (kappa) was used to determine the significance of the level of agreement between raters. The value of kappa was 0.838 with a 95 per cent confidence interval of 0.801 to 0.975. The results of this study are encouraging and support the use of the five Case Types - Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, Psychogeriatric, Geriatric Evaluation and Management, and Maintenance Care. All five Case Types proved to have good interrater reliability, there was a good fit for most patients, and staff found the definitions easy to use.

摘要

这是澳大利亚第一项测试各类“护理事件”定义的研究。此处报告的定义是1996年全国亚急性和非急性患者(SNAP)病例组合分类研究中所使用的定义。该研究收集了10家医院和2家社区卫生服务机构共683名患者的数据,这些机构提供一系列康复、老年护理和社区护理服务。kappa统计量(kappa)用于确定评分者之间一致性水平的显著性。kappa值为0.838,95%置信区间为0.801至0.975。本研究结果令人鼓舞,并支持使用五种病例类型——姑息治疗、康复、老年精神科、老年评估与管理以及维持性护理。所有这五种病例类型均证明具有良好的评分者间信度,对大多数患者而言匹配良好,且工作人员发现这些定义易于使用。

相似文献

1
Defining an episode of care: a study of five case types.界定一段护理过程:对五种病例类型的研究
Aust Health Rev. 1997;20(3):105-19. doi: 10.1071/ah970105.
2
Subacute and non-acute casemix in Australia.
Med J Aust. 1998 Oct 19;169(S1):S22-5. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb123471.x.
3
Classifying sub-acute and non-acute patients: results of the New South Wales Casemix Area Network study.
Aust Health Rev. 1997;20(2):26-42. doi: 10.1071/ah970026.
4
The Australian National Sub-Acute and Non-Acute Patient casemix classification.澳大利亚国家亚急性和非急性患者病例组合分类。
Aust Health Rev. 1999;22(3):180-96. doi: 10.1071/ah990180.
5
The development of Version 2 of the AN-SNAP casemix classification system.
Aust Health Rev. 2007 Apr;31 Suppl 1:S68-78. doi: 10.1071/ah070s68.
6
The Australian National Sub-acute and Non-acute Patient Casemix Classification (AN-SNAP): its application and value in a stroke rehabilitation programme.澳大利亚国家亚急性和非急性患者病例组合分类系统(AN-SNAP):其在中风康复项目中的应用及价值
Clin Rehabil. 2000 Oct;14(5):532-7. doi: 10.1191/0269215500cr357oa.
7
The Australian National Non-Acute Inpatient Project.澳大利亚国家非急性住院患者项目
Aust Health Rev. 1993;16(3):300-19.
8
An Australian casemix classification for palliative care: lessons and policy implications of a national study.澳大利亚姑息治疗病例组合分类:一项全国性研究的经验教训及政策影响。
Palliat Med. 2004 Apr;18(3):227-33. doi: 10.1191/0269216304pm876oa.
9
Casemix and rehabilitation: evaluation of an early discharge scheme.病例组合与康复:一项早期出院计划的评估
Aust Health Rev. 2000;23(3):154-61. doi: 10.1071/ah000154.
10
An Australian casemix classification for palliative care: technical development and results.澳大利亚姑息治疗病例组合分类:技术开发与结果
Palliat Med. 2004 Apr;18(3):217-26. doi: 10.1191/0269216304pm875oa.

引用本文的文献

1
A pilot study on patient-related costs and factors associated with the cost of specialist palliative care in the hospital: first steps towards a patient classification system in Germany.一项关于患者相关费用以及与医院专科姑息治疗费用相关因素的试点研究:迈向德国患者分类系统的第一步。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Oct 16;16:35. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0154-3. eCollection 2018.
2
Determining appropriateness for rehabilitation or other subacute care: is there a role for utilisation review?确定康复或其他亚急性护理的适宜性:利用审查是否能发挥作用?
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007 Mar 13;4:3. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-3.