Fiedler J L, Day L M
Social Sectors Development Strategies, Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235, USA.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1997 Oct-Dec;12(4):251-77. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199710/12)12:4<251::AID-HPM489>3.0.CO;2-1.
This article presents a step-down cost analysis using secondary data sources from 26 Bangladesh non-government organizations (NGOs) providing family planning services under a US Agency for International Development-funded umbrella organization. The unit costs of the NGOs' Maternal-Child Health (MCH) clinics and community-based distribution (CBD) systems were calculated and found to be minimally different. Several simulations were conducted to investigate the impact of alternative cost-reduction measures. The more general financial analysis proved more insightful than the unit cost analysis in terms of identifying means by which to improve the efficiency of the family planning operations of these NGOs. The analysis revealed that 56 per cent of total expenditures in the two-tiered umbrella's organizational structure are incurred in management operations and overheads. Of the remaining 44 per cent of project expenditures, 39 per cent is spent on the CBD program and 5 per cent on the MCH clinics. Within the CBD program, most resources are spent providing 4 million contacts (two-thirds of the annual total) which do not involve contraceptive re-supply. The clinics devote more resources to providing MCH services than to providing family planning services. The findings suggest that significant savings could be generated by containing administrative costs, improving operational efficiency, and reducing unnecessary or redundant fieldworker contacts. The magnitude of the potential savings raises a fundamental question about the continued viability and sustainability of this supply-driven CBD strategy.
本文利用来自26个孟加拉国非政府组织的二手数据源进行了逐步成本分析,这些组织在美国国际开发署资助的一个总括组织下提供计划生育服务。计算了这些非政府组织的母婴健康(MCH)诊所和社区分发(CBD)系统的单位成本,发现差异极小。进行了几次模拟,以调查替代成本降低措施的影响。在确定提高这些非政府组织计划生育业务效率的方法方面,更全面的财务分析比单位成本分析更具洞察力。分析表明,两级总括组织结构中总支出的56%用于管理运营和间接费用。在其余44%的项目支出中,39%用于CBD项目,5%用于MCH诊所。在CBD项目中,大部分资源用于提供400万次接触(占年度总数的三分之二),这些接触不涉及避孕药具的再供应。诊所投入更多资源提供母婴健康服务,而不是计划生育服务。研究结果表明,通过控制行政成本、提高运营效率和减少不必要或多余的外勤人员接触,可以节省大量资金。潜在节省的规模引发了一个关于这种供应驱动型CBD战略持续可行性和可持续性的基本问题。