Kirby E G, Sebastian J G
Texas Tech University, USA.
J Healthc Manag. 1998 Jan-Feb;43(1):81-95; discussion 96-8.
Drawing on institutional theory, this study examines how adherence to a number of "institutional" and "technical" environmental forces can influence the business success of managed care organizations (MCOs). The standards studied include: (1) institutional forces: socially accepted procedures for delivering care (access to quality care, availability of information, and delivery of care in a personal manner); and (2) technical forces: industry standards for cost control and efficient use of financial and medical resources. The most significant finding is that successful MCOs must conform to both institutional and technical forces to be successful. MCOs that conform to either one or the other type of standard were no more successful than those that conformed to neither. These findings have several important implications for MCO strategy. First, to be successful, MCO executives must understand the external environment in which they operate. They must anticipate and respond to shifts in that environment. Second, this understanding of the external environment must place equal emphasis on societal demands (e.g., for accessible care and information) and on technical demands (e.g., for cost-efficient care). These findings may well reflect that once managed care penetration reaches relatively high levels, marketshare can no longer be gained through cost-efficiency alone; rather, enrollee satisfaction based on societal demands becomes a key factor in maintaining and gaining marketshare. Institutional theory provides' some strategies for accomplishing these goals. Cost-containment strategies include implementing policies for cutting costs in areas that do not affect the quality of care, such as using generic drugs and reducing administrative excesses and redundancies. At the same time, MCOs must implement strategies aimed at improving conformity to prevailing societal perceptions of appropriate care, including providing patients more freedom to choose their physicians and encouraging and rewarding care providers for being friendly and personable. An MCO should work to inform the public of the organization's efforts to provide high-quality, low-cost medical care in a friendly, convenient manner.
本研究运用制度理论,探讨遵循若干“制度性”和“技术性”环境力量如何影响管理式医疗组织(MCO)的商业成功。所研究的标准包括:(1)制度力量:社会认可的医疗服务提供程序(获得优质医疗服务、信息可得性以及个性化的医疗服务提供);(2)技术力量:成本控制以及金融和医疗资源有效利用的行业标准。最显著的发现是,成功的MCO必须同时符合制度和技术力量才能取得成功。仅符合其中一种标准的MCO并不比两种标准都不符合的MCO更成功。这些发现对MCO战略有若干重要启示。首先,要取得成功,MCO高管必须了解其运营所处的外部环境。他们必须预测并应对该环境的变化。其次,对外部环境的这种理解必须同等重视社会需求(例如,可及的医疗服务和信息)和技术需求(例如,成本效益高的医疗服务)。这些发现很可能反映出,一旦管理式医疗渗透率达到相对较高水平,仅靠成本效益已无法再获取市场份额;相反,基于社会需求的参保人满意度成为维持和获取市场份额的关键因素。制度理论提供了实现这些目标的一些策略。成本控制策略包括在不影响医疗质量的领域实施削减成本的政策,例如使用通用药物以及减少行政过度和冗余。与此同时,MCO必须实施旨在更好地符合社会对适当医疗服务普遍认知的策略,包括给予患者更多选择医生的自由,以及鼓励和奖励医护人员友好和善。MCO应努力向公众宣传该组织以友好、便捷的方式提供高质量、低成本医疗服务的努力。