Perlmutter D F, Suico C, Krauss A N, Auld P A
New York Hospital, New York 10021, USA.
Am J Manag Care. 1998 Apr;4(4):548-52.
Our hypothesis was that a program designed to identify the causes of discharge delays would reduce the length of stay in our neonatal intensive care unit. We reviewed every admission from January, 1994, to December, 1995. A discharge delay was defined as any delay not related to illness after the infant was cleared for release. Discharge delays were divided into the following categories: primary healthcare team, organizational, discharge planning, family, monitor related, and other. Potential discharge delays were identified daily according to established criteria. Actual discharge delays were reviewed monthly at a staff meeting attended by representatives of a multidisciplinary team. We identified 116 discharge delays, which accounted for 480 patient days. Eighty-three discharge delays accounted for 302 patient days in 1994, and 33 discharge delays for 178 patient days in 1995. Discharge delays ranged from 1 to 34 days, with an average of 4.1 days added per patient. Infants with discharge delays had a case mix index of 9.32. The average case mix index for the neonatal intensive care unit was 6.25 during 1994 and 5.18 during 1995, an average of 5.71 for the review period. Forty-four percent of infants who had discharge delays had private insurance, 55% had Medicaid, and 1% had self-payment arrangements. Eighty-eight of 116 discharge delays were caused by circumstances beyond the control of the primary care team. An additional 25 of 116 discharge delays were the result of our policy requiring 48 hours free of apnea-bradycardia alarms before discharge. Discharge delays for 1994 cost $226,298 ($749/day). For 1995, discharge delays cost $41,553 ($233/day) for a total cost of $262,431. Total savings in 1995 versus 1994 was $184,745 ($516/day). Despite the low birth weight and relatively severe illnesses of the infants, we believe that a focused team approach and monitoring for potential discharge delays can result in considerable reduction in hospital stay and cost.
我们的假设是,一个旨在确定出院延迟原因的项目将缩短新生儿重症监护病房的住院时间。我们回顾了1994年1月至1995年12月期间的每一次入院情况。出院延迟被定义为婴儿被批准出院后与疾病无关的任何延迟。出院延迟分为以下几类:初级医疗团队、组织、出院计划、家庭、监测相关及其他。根据既定标准每日确定潜在的出院延迟。每月在多学科团队代表参加的员工会议上审查实际出院延迟情况。我们确定了116次出院延迟,共计480个患者日。1994年有83次出院延迟,共计302个患者日;1995年有33次出院延迟,共计178个患者日。出院延迟时间从1天到34天不等,平均每位患者增加4.1天。有出院延迟的婴儿的病例组合指数为9.32。1994年新生儿重症监护病房的平均病例组合指数为6.25,1995年为5.18,审查期间平均为5.71。有出院延迟的婴儿中,44%有私人保险,55%有医疗补助,1%有自费安排。116次出院延迟中有88次是由初级医疗团队无法控制的情况导致的。116次出院延迟中还有25次是由于我们的政策要求出院前48小时无呼吸暂停-心动过缓警报。1994年出院延迟的费用为226,298美元(每天749美元)。1995年出院延迟的费用为41,553美元(每天233美元),总费用为262,431美元。1995年与1994年相比总节省184,745美元(每天516美元)。尽管婴儿出生体重低且病情相对严重,但我们认为,采用专注的团队方法并监测潜在的出院延迟可显著缩短住院时间并降低成本。