• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Evaluating the cost effectiveness of newer psychotropic medications.

作者信息

Viale G L

机构信息

Central Mental Health, San Jose, CA 95126, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 1997 Feb;3 Suppl:S7-10.

PMID:10180341
Abstract

With the introduction of newer, more expensive psychotropic medications, pharmacists must consider the cost-effectiveness issues related to the use of these drugs. In general, the newer agents are more effective than conventional drugs, have improved side-effect profiles, and are associated with a lower rate of recidivism. However, because of cost constraints, not every patient who needs a newer psychotropic drug has the opportunity to receive it. To provide these patients with the medication they need, we must look beyond the acquisition cost of the drug and focus on the global impact of the medication on the total mental health budget at a facility. Data from this point of view can justify the greater expense of the medication, and more importantly, the patient can be better served. Cost-effectiveness data from one's own institution may be more convincing to formulary committee members than data from academic centers and can help make newer, more expensive agents available to the patients who need them. Designing and implementing a retrospective study is one means of obtaining these cost-effectiveness data.

摘要

相似文献

1
Evaluating the cost effectiveness of newer psychotropic medications.
Am J Manag Care. 1997 Feb;3 Suppl:S7-10.
2
Looking beyond the formulary budget in cost-benefit analysis.
Am J Manag Care. 1997 Feb;3 Suppl:S11-7.
3
Dialogue. Prescription for problems? Capitating mental health drugs--the great debate.对话。解决问题的处方?精神类药物按人头付费——激烈辩论。
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1998 Oct;7(5):32-8.
4
Improving mental health treatments through comparative effectiveness research.通过比较效果研究改善心理健康治疗。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):783-91. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.783.
5
Pharmaco-economic analysis of psychotropic drugs.精神药物的药物经济学分析。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2000 Mar;48(3):307-10.
6
[Autonomy attitudes in the treatment compliance of a cohort of subjects with continuous psychotropic drug administration].[一组持续接受精神药物治疗的受试者治疗依从性中的自主性态度]
Encephale. 2002 Sep-Oct;28(5 Pt 1):389-96.
7
Impact of formulary restrictions on the cost-effectiveness of antidepressant treatment.处方集限制对抗抑郁治疗成本效益的影响。
Manag Care Q. 2002 Summer;10(3):21-31.
8
Pharmacoeconomic and health outcome comparison of lithium and divalproex in a VA geriatric nursing home population: influence of drug-related morbidity on total cost of treatment.
Am J Manag Care. 1999 Feb;5(2):197-204.
9
Potential cost savings from pill splitting of newer psychotropic medications.新型精神药物分药带来的潜在成本节约。
Psychiatr Serv. 2000 Apr;51(4):527-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.51.4.527.
10
Outpatient cancer drug costs: changes, drivers, and the future.门诊癌症药物费用:变化、驱动因素及未来
Cancer. 2002 Feb 15;94(4):1142-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Risperidone. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in schizophrenia.利培酮。对其用于精神分裂症的药物经济学综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Jul;14(1):97-133. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814010-00009.