Meredith P, Wood C
Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.
Qual Health Care. 1998 Jun;7(2):65-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.7.2.65.
To find out how patients recently undergoing surgery experienced the consenting process and the response of these patients to a pamphlet on consent to surgery. To test the reaction of health professionals to the pamphlet.
A pilot pamphlet was produced and a questionnaire was sent to patients inquiring about their consenting experience, and how the pamphlet might have helped them through the consent procedure. A pamphlet and a questionnaire were also sent to a random sample of the health professionals serving these patients.
Patients and health professionals.
61% of patients returned the questionnaire. Knowledge about the consent procedure was shown to be limited. 49% were unaware that they had the right to insist that the surgeon could only perform the specified operation and nothing more. 83% were unaware that they could add something in writing to the consent form before signing. 28% of health professionals returned their questionnaire, most of whom thought that the pamphlet provided a useful contribution to surgeon-patient communication.
Evidence shows that patients are not well informed about consenting to surgery and further information would provide much needed guidance on understanding their role in the consent procedure. The low response from the health professional study is perhaps an indication that at present this is an issue which is not seen as a priority.
了解近期接受手术的患者对同意手术过程的体验,以及这些患者对一份关于手术同意书的宣传册的反应。测试医疗专业人员对该宣传册的反应。
制作了一份试验性宣传册,并向患者发送问卷,询问他们的同意体验,以及该宣传册如何在同意手术过程中帮助他们。还向为这些患者服务的医疗专业人员的随机样本发送了一份宣传册和一份问卷。
患者和医疗专业人员。
61%的患者返回了问卷。结果显示患者对同意手术过程的了解有限。49%的患者不知道他们有权坚持外科医生只能进行指定的手术,不能进行其他手术。83%的患者不知道他们可以在签署同意书之前以书面形式添加内容。28%的医疗专业人员返回了问卷,其中大多数人认为该宣传册对外科医生与患者的沟通有很大帮助。
有证据表明患者对手术同意书了解不足,更多信息将为他们理解自己在同意手术过程中的角色提供急需的指导。医疗专业人员研究的低回复率可能表明目前这个问题未被视为优先事项。