Suppr超能文献

探讨一份关于手术同意的信息手册在改善外科医生与患者沟通方面的潜在价值。

Inquiry into the potential value of an information pamphlet on consent to surgery to improve surgeon-patient communication.

作者信息

Meredith P, Wood C

机构信息

Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.

出版信息

Qual Health Care. 1998 Jun;7(2):65-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.7.2.65.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To find out how patients recently undergoing surgery experienced the consenting process and the response of these patients to a pamphlet on consent to surgery. To test the reaction of health professionals to the pamphlet.

DESIGN

A pilot pamphlet was produced and a questionnaire was sent to patients inquiring about their consenting experience, and how the pamphlet might have helped them through the consent procedure. A pamphlet and a questionnaire were also sent to a random sample of the health professionals serving these patients.

SUBJECTS

Patients and health professionals.

RESULTS

61% of patients returned the questionnaire. Knowledge about the consent procedure was shown to be limited. 49% were unaware that they had the right to insist that the surgeon could only perform the specified operation and nothing more. 83% were unaware that they could add something in writing to the consent form before signing. 28% of health professionals returned their questionnaire, most of whom thought that the pamphlet provided a useful contribution to surgeon-patient communication.

CONCLUSION

Evidence shows that patients are not well informed about consenting to surgery and further information would provide much needed guidance on understanding their role in the consent procedure. The low response from the health professional study is perhaps an indication that at present this is an issue which is not seen as a priority.

摘要

目的

了解近期接受手术的患者对同意手术过程的体验,以及这些患者对一份关于手术同意书的宣传册的反应。测试医疗专业人员对该宣传册的反应。

设计

制作了一份试验性宣传册,并向患者发送问卷,询问他们的同意体验,以及该宣传册如何在同意手术过程中帮助他们。还向为这些患者服务的医疗专业人员的随机样本发送了一份宣传册和一份问卷。

对象

患者和医疗专业人员。

结果

61%的患者返回了问卷。结果显示患者对同意手术过程的了解有限。49%的患者不知道他们有权坚持外科医生只能进行指定的手术,不能进行其他手术。83%的患者不知道他们可以在签署同意书之前以书面形式添加内容。28%的医疗专业人员返回了问卷,其中大多数人认为该宣传册对外科医生与患者的沟通有很大帮助。

结论

有证据表明患者对手术同意书了解不足,更多信息将为他们理解自己在同意手术过程中的角色提供急需的指导。医疗专业人员研究的低回复率可能表明目前这个问题未被视为优先事项。

相似文献

4
The changing face of informed surgical consent.
J Laryngol Otol. 2012 Mar;126(3):236-9. doi: 10.1017/S0022215111003021. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
8
Factors affecting quality of informed consent.影响知情同意质量的因素。
BMJ. 1993 Apr 3;306(6882):885-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6882.885.
10
Informed consent: it's not just signing a form.知情同意:它不只是签署一份表格。
Thorac Surg Clin. 2005 Nov;15(4):451-60, v. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2005.06.001.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Informed consent to elective surgery: the 'therapeutic' value?
Soc Sci Med. 1986;22(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90305-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验