Is sex medically necessary? Who should pay for Viagra?
作者信息
La Puma J
出版信息
Manag Care. 1998 Jun;7(6):52, 55.
PMID:10180804
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Is sex medically necessary? Who should pay for Viagra?
Manag Care. 1998 Jun;7(6):52, 55.
2
Stats & facts. The rapidly growing market of erectile dysfunction.统计数据与事实。勃起功能障碍市场迅速增长。
Manag Care Interface. 1998 Jul;11(7):44-5.
3
Perspectives. Viagra or bust: is pharmacy cost crisis unraveling HMO utilization strategy?观点。伟哥还是破产：药房成本危机是否正在瓦解健康维护组织的使用策略？
Med Health. 1998 Jul 13;52(28):suppl 1-4.
4
[Improved penile erection is most often good for two persons!].
Lakartidningen. 1998 Nov 11;95(46):5139.
5
[Support permanent discount for Viagra and Cialis in MS! Specified subsidy according to the Danish model is justified].[支持在多发性硬化症中对伟哥和希爱力给予永久性折扣！按照丹麦模式提供特定补贴是合理的]
Lakartidningen. 2004 Aug 26;101(35):2666-7.
6
The economics of Viagra.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 Mar-Apr;19(2):147-57. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.2.147.
7
Who foots the bill? HMOs confront the rising popularity of designer drugs.
Mod Healthc. 1998 Jun 29;28(26):162.
8
Valuing Viagra: what is restoring potency worth?评估伟哥的价值：恢复性功能的价值几何？
Eff Clin Pract. 1999 Jul-Aug;2(4):171-5.
9
[Somatization of erectile disorders by the introduction of sildenafil].[通过引入西地那非实现勃起功能障碍的躯体化]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 Oct 24;142(43):2333-6.
10
[The condition--not the drug--is decisive when it comes to subsidizing. Increased objectivity in the debate on subsidized "quality of life drugs" is required].
Lakartidningen. 2000 May 24;97(21):2612-4.
引用本文的文献
1
Quality-of-Life Utility Values for Erectile Function and Sildenafil Treatment.生活质量效用值在勃起功能障碍和西地那非治疗中的应用
Clin Drug Investig. 2005;25(2):99-105. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200525020-00002.
Zotero 插件