• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经济学、公共卫生与医疗保健采购:泰赛德地区的规划预算与边际分析经验

Economics, public health and health care purchasing: the Tayside experience of programme budgeting and marginal analysis.

作者信息

Ruta D A, Donaldson C, Gilray I

机构信息

Department of Public Health Medicine, Tayside Health Board, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 Oct;1(4):185-93. doi: 10.1177/135581969600100402.

DOI:10.1177/135581969600100402
PMID:10180869
Abstract

In this paper it is shown how the economics framework of programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) can be used to help formulate a purchasing strategy in health care; in this case, for child health services. The basic premise of PBMA is that to have more of some services it is necessary to have less of others. Therefore, it is important to know how resources are currently spent, what changes can be made, and what are the possible costs and benefits of such changes. Despite a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of services, PBMA provides a pragmatic purchasing framework. This framework permits consideration of national policy, local epidemiology, current spending, and the views both of parents and professionals as to how such spending can be changed.

摘要

本文展示了如何运用规划预算和边际分析(PBMA)的经济学框架来帮助制定医疗保健采购策略;在此案例中,是针对儿童保健服务。PBMA的基本前提是,要增加某些服务的提供量,就必须减少其他服务的提供量。因此,了解资源目前的使用方式、可以做出哪些改变以及这些改变可能带来的成本和收益非常重要。尽管缺乏关于服务有效性的证据,但PBMA提供了一个务实的采购框架。该框架允许考虑国家政策、当地流行病学情况、当前支出以及家长和专业人士对于如何改变此类支出的看法。

相似文献

1
Economics, public health and health care purchasing: the Tayside experience of programme budgeting and marginal analysis.经济学、公共卫生与医疗保健采购:泰赛德地区的规划预算与边际分析经验
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 Oct;1(4):185-93. doi: 10.1177/135581969600100402.
2
Economics, public health and health care purchasing: reinventing the wheel?经济学、公共卫生与医疗保健采购:是在 reinventing the wheel(可意译为“ reinventing the wheel”,直译为“重新发明轮子”,此处表示做徒劳无功之事)吗?
Health Policy. 1995 Aug;33(2):79-90. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)93670-v.
3
PBMA (programme budgeting marginal analysis)--its role in the future purchasing arrangements for health care services.规划预算边际分析(PBMA)——其在未来医疗服务采购安排中的作用。
Health Policy. 1995 Aug;33(2):157-60. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)93675-q.
4
Using programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) to set priorities: reflections from a qualitative assessment in an English Primary Care Trust.运用计划预算编制和边际分析(PBMA)确定优先事项:在英国初级保健信托机构进行定性评估的思考。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Dec;98:162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.020. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
5
Programme budgeting and marginal analysis: application within programmes to assist purchasing in Greater Glasgow Health Board.项目预算编制与边际分析:在项目中应用以协助大格拉斯哥健康委员会的采购工作。
Health Policy. 1995 Aug;33(2):91-105. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)93671-m.
6
Institutional considerations in priority setting: transactions cost perspective on PBMA.优先事项设定中的制度考量:基于交易成本视角的优先事项管理分析
Health Econ. 2000 Oct;9(7):631-41. doi: 10.1002/1099-1050(200010)9:7<631::aid-hec531>3.0.co;2-n.
7
Public health and economics in tandem: programme budgeting, marginal analysis and priority setting in practice.公共卫生与经济学协同发展:实践中的项目预算编制、边际分析与优先事项设定
Health Policy. 1995 Aug;33(2):161-8. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)93676-r.
8
Tools of the trade: a comparative analysis of approaches to priority setting in healthcare.行业工具:医疗保健领域优先事项设定方法的比较分析
Health Serv Manage Res. 2003 May;16(2):96-105. doi: 10.1258/095148403321591410.
9
Programme budgeting and marginal analysis: an approach to priority setting in need of refinement.方案预算编制与边际分析:一种亟待完善的确定优先事项的方法。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 Jul;1(3):147-53. doi: 10.1177/135581969600100306.
10
Programme budgeting and marginal analysis: a case study of maternity services.方案预算编制与边际分析:以产科服务为例的案例研究
J Public Health Med. 1996 Jun;18(2):175-82. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024477.

引用本文的文献

1
Can the real opportunity cost stand up: displaced services, the straw man outside the room.真正的机会成本能站得住脚吗:被取代的服务,房间外的稻草人。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Apr;32(4):319-25. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0140-3.
2
Identifying research priorities for health care priority setting: a collaborative effort between managers and researchers.确定医疗保健优先事项设定的研究重点:管理者和研究人员之间的合作努力。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Sep 15;9:165. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-165.
3
Programme budgeting and marginal analysis: bridging the divide between doctors and managers.
计划预算与边际分析:弥合医生与管理人员之间的分歧
BMJ. 2005 Jun 25;330(7506):1501-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1501.
4
Health care priority setting: principles, practice and challenges.医疗保健的优先事项设定:原则、实践与挑战
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2004 Apr 22;2(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-2-3.