• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高胆固醇血症的管理策略:成本效益文献的系统评价

Strategies for the management of hypercholesterolaemia: a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness literature.

作者信息

Morris S, McGuire A, Caro J, Pettitt D

机构信息

Department of Economics, City University, London, UK.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 Oct;2(4):231-50. doi: 10.1177/135581969700200408.

DOI:10.1177/135581969700200408
PMID:10182252
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review research addressing the management of cholesterol in the prevention of coronary heart disease in order to assess the cost-effectiveness of such interventions.

METHODS

A systematic review of economic evaluations identified through searches of MEDLINE and the Social Sciences Citation Index revealed 38 studies addressing the cost-effectiveness of cholesterol management. They were distinguished according to screening approaches, dietary advice and drug treatment. Most studies were not associated directly with clinical trial results, but adopted economic modelling approaches.

RESULTS

Whilst there is general agreement among the majority of analyses, studies of cholesterol management concerned with screening strategies were extremely sensitive to changes in their assumptions; so much so that only a limited emphasis may be placed on specific cost-effectiveness ratios and the conclusions drawn from them. All studies considered direct costs, though many were limited to drug costs. The cost-effectiveness of primary prevention by cholesterol-lowering drugs is highly variable, depending on age at initiation of treatment and cardiovascular risk profile. Pharmacological intervention is least cost-effective in the young and the elderly. The cost-effectiveness of cholesterol-reducing agents improves when they are targeted at those at high risk. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are generally more effective and more cost-effective at reducing cholesterol-related coronary events than other medications.

CONCLUSION

The methods and economic data upon which these studies are based need to be improved if robust policy conclusions are to be formulated.

摘要

目的

回顾关于胆固醇管理在预防冠心病方面的研究,以评估此类干预措施的成本效益。

方法

通过检索MEDLINE和社会科学引文索引对经济评估进行系统回顾,共发现38项关于胆固醇管理成本效益的研究。这些研究根据筛查方法、饮食建议和药物治疗进行区分。大多数研究并非直接与临床试验结果相关,而是采用经济建模方法。

结果

虽然大多数分析意见基本一致,但涉及筛查策略的胆固醇管理研究对其假设的变化极为敏感;以至于对特定的成本效益比及其得出的结论只能给予有限的重视。所有研究都考虑了直接成本,不过许多研究仅限于药物成本。通过降低胆固醇药物进行一级预防的成本效益差异很大,这取决于开始治疗时的年龄和心血管风险状况。药物干预在年轻人和老年人中成本效益最低。当针对高危人群时,降低胆固醇药物的成本效益会提高。与其他药物相比,HMG-CoA还原酶抑制剂在降低胆固醇相关冠心病事件方面通常更有效且更具成本效益。

结论

如果要得出可靠的政策结论,这些研究所依据的方法和经济数据需要改进。

相似文献

1
Strategies for the management of hypercholesterolaemia: a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness literature.高胆固醇血症的管理策略:成本效益文献的系统评价
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 Oct;2(4):231-50. doi: 10.1177/135581969700200408.
2
Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapies according to selected patient characteristics.根据选定的患者特征评估降胆固醇治疗的成本效益。
Ann Intern Med. 2000 May 16;132(10):769-79. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-10-200005160-00002.
3
Development and validation of a model to project the long-term benefit and cost of alternative lipid-lowering strategies in patients with hypercholesterolaemia.高胆固醇血症患者替代降脂策略长期效益和成本预测模型的开发与验证
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22 Suppl 3:37-48. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422003-00005.
4
[Cost-benefit analysis of an evidence-based secondary prevention of coronary heart diseases by statins. An analysis for Germany from a social security perspective].[他汀类药物对冠心病进行循证二级预防的成本效益分析。从社会保障角度对德国的一项分析]
Med Klin (Munich). 2000 Jun 15;95(6):305-13. doi: 10.1007/pl00002127.
5
Cost effectiveness of lowering cholesterol concentration with statins in patients with and without pre-existing coronary heart disease: life table method applied to health authority population.他汀类药物降低已有或无冠心病患者胆固醇浓度的成本效益:应用于卫生当局人群的生命表法
BMJ. 1996 Jun 8;312(7044):1443-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7044.1443.
6
Cost effectiveness of treatment to National Cholesterol Education Panel (NCEP) targets with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Trial design.使用HMG-CoA还原酶抑制剂将治疗调整至达到国家胆固醇教育计划(NCEP)目标的成本效益。试验设计。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Aug;12(2 Pt 2):278-85. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712020-00018.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of cholesterol-lowering therapies in Spain.西班牙降胆固醇疗法的成本效益分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2006;6(3):177-88. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200606030-00005.
8
Fluvastatin: a review of its pharmacology and use in the management of hypercholesterolaemia.氟伐他汀:其药理学及在高胆固醇血症管理中的应用综述
Drugs. 1996 Mar;51(3):433-59. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651030-00011.
9
The cost-effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors to prevent coronary heart disease. Estimating the benefits of increasing HDL-C.HMG-CoA还原酶抑制剂预防冠心病的成本效益。评估提高高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)的益处。
JAMA. 1995 Apr 5;273(13):1032-8.
10
Pravastatin. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.普伐他汀。对其在冠心病一级和二级预防中应用的药物经济学综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Aug;14(2):217-36. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814020-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) after myocardial infarction: results from Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto (GISSI)-Prevenzione Trial.心肌梗死后n-3多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFA)的成本效益分析:意大利心肌梗死存活研究组(GISSI)-预防试验的结果
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(4):411-20. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119040-00008.
2
Testing the validity of cost-effectiveness models.检验成本效益模型的有效性。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 May;17(5):501-13. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200017050-00007.
3
Choice of cost-effectiveness measure in the economic evaluation of cholesterol-modifying pharmacotherapy. An illustrative example focusing on the primary prevention of coronary heart disease in Canada.
胆固醇调节药物治疗的经济评估中成本效益衡量指标的选择。以加拿大冠心病一级预防为例。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Aug;16(2):193-205. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916020-00008.
4
Numbers needed to treat derived from meta-analyses--sometimes informative, usually misleading.荟萃分析得出的需治疗人数——有时提供信息,通常具有误导性。
BMJ. 1999 Jun 5;318(7197):1548-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7197.1548.
5
The cost of treating dyslipidaemia using National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines.采用美国国家胆固醇教育计划(NCEP)指南治疗血脂异常的成本。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;14 Suppl 3:19-28. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814003-00003.
6
Resource utilisation in the management of dyslipidaemia.血脂异常管理中的资源利用
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;14 Suppl 3:11-8. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814003-00002.
7
Impact of dyslipidaemia. Lessons from clinical trials.血脂异常的影响。临床试验的经验教训。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;14 Suppl 3:1-9. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814003-00001.