R v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Ex parte Blood. 17 October 1996.
出版信息
Health Care Anal. 1997 Jun;5(2):157-60.
PMID:10184712
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
R v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Ex parte Blood. 17 October 1996.
Health Care Anal. 1997 Jun;5(2):157-60.
2
Infertility treatment: posthumous use of sperm -- R. v. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, ex parte D.B.
Med Law Rev. 1996 Autumn;4(3):329-35.
3
Bending the statutory rules: the case of Mrs. Blood.
Health Care Anal. 1997 Sep;5(3):238-240, 243. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1042(199709)5:3<237::aid-hca234>3.0.co;2-5.
4
R v. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, ex parte Blood.
All Engl Law Rep. 1997 Feb 6;[1997] 2:687-704.
5
Widow's case raises issues of informed consent.
BMJ. 1996 Nov 30;313(7069):1351. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7069.1351a.
6
More questions than answers? R v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority ex parte Blood The Times 7th February 1997.
Med Law Int. 1997;3(1):75-81. doi: 10.1177/096853329700300104.
7
Widow appeals over denial of right to husband's sperm.
Lancet. 1996 Oct 26;348(9035):1164. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)65292-0.
8
A unique case of frozen sperm export?
Lancet. 1997 Feb 15;349(9050):448. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)61180-4.
9
British widow fights to have her dead husband's baby.
BMJ. 1996 Oct 26;313(7064):1035. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7064.1035.
10
Government reviews law on "posthumous conceptions".
BMJ. 1997 Oct 4;315(7112):834.
引用本文的文献
1
Withholding life-sustaining treatment: the case of Miss D.
Health Care Anal. 1997 Sep;5(3):237-8.
本文引用的文献
1
R v. Tait.
All Engl Law Rep. 1989 Apr 26;[1989] 3:682-9.
2
Health care in the courts.
Health Care Anal. 1994 May;2(2):143-4.
Zotero 插件