Bending the statutory rules: the case of Mrs. Blood.
作者信息
Delany Linda
出版信息
Health Care Anal. 1997 Sep;5(3):238-240, 243. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1042(199709)5:3<237::aid-hca234>3.0.co;2-5.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Bending the statutory rules: the case of Mrs. Blood.违反法定规则：布拉德夫人案
Health Care Anal. 1997 Sep;5(3):238-240, 243. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1042(199709)5:3<237::aid-hca234>3.0.co;2-5.
2
3
R v. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, ex parte Blood.R诉人类受精与胚胎管理局案，由布拉德（Blood）提出的单方面诉讼。
All Engl Law Rep. 1997 Feb 6;[1997] 2:687-704.
4
Widow appeals over denial of right to husband's sperm.寡妇就被剥夺获取亡夫精子的权利提出上诉。
Lancet. 1996 Oct 26;348(9035):1164. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)65292-0.
5
Diane Blood and the HFEA.黛安·布拉德与人类受精与胚胎管理局。
Bull Med Ethics. 1997 Jan;No. 124:2.
6
Widow allowed to export husband's sperm.寡妇获许出口其丈夫的精子。
BMJ. 1997 Mar 8;314(7082):696.
7
Widow's case raises issues of informed consent.寡妇的案例引发了知情同意的问题。
BMJ. 1996 Nov 30;313(7069):1351. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7069.1351a.
8
Regulating the new reproductive technologies: a cross-channel comparison.
Med Law Int. 1998;3(2-3):89-115. doi: 10.1177/096853329800300301.
9
R v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Ex parte Blood. 17 October 1996.R诉人类受精与胚胎学管理局。布罗德案（1996年10月17日）。
Health Care Anal. 1997 Jun;5(2):157-60.
10
Lessons learned from Great Britain's Human Fertilization and Embryology Act: should the United States regulate the fate of unused frozen embryos?
Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J. 1997 Aug;19(4):1027-53.
Zotero 插件