• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康与效率:剖析临床疗效

Health and efficiency: clinical effectiveness dissected.

作者信息

Keaney M, Lorimer A R

机构信息

Scottish Clinical Audit Resource Centre, Department of Postgraduate Medical Education, University of Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 1998 Sep;6(3):208-15. doi: 10.1007/BF02678106.

DOI:10.1007/BF02678106
PMID:10185172
Abstract

If the exclusive promotion of values inimical to our basic humanity extends to the health care policy arena, we face a defensive, restricted, impersonal and ultimately impoverished health care system. Americans known it already as 'managed-care'. This is why it is crucial for health policy analysts to make explicit the role of values in policy-making, especially that involving the input of 'value-neutral' economics. The nature of any clinical effectiveness policy will be determined by the understanding of cost-effectiveness employed in its design and implementation. Given that cost-effectiveness is nowadays usually defined according to health economists' criteria, the battle over the meaning of clinical effectiveness is a significant development in health economics' move to assume control of the NHS.

摘要

如果对我们基本人性有害的价值观的独家推广延伸到医疗保健政策领域,我们将面临一个防御性的、受限的、冷漠的,最终是匮乏的医疗保健系统。美国人已经将其称为“管理式医疗”。这就是为什么卫生政策分析师必须明确价值观在政策制定中的作用至关重要,尤其是涉及“价值中立”经济学的投入时。任何临床有效性政策的性质将取决于其设计和实施中所采用的成本效益的理解。鉴于如今成本效益通常是根据卫生经济学家的标准来定义的,关于临床有效性含义的争论是卫生经济学在试图掌控国民医疗服务体系过程中的一个重大进展。

相似文献

1
Health and efficiency: clinical effectiveness dissected.健康与效率:剖析临床疗效
Health Care Anal. 1998 Sep;6(3):208-15. doi: 10.1007/BF02678106.
2
Evidence-based medicine as an instrument for rational health policy.循证医学作为制定合理卫生政策的工具。
Health Care Anal. 2002;10(3):261-75. doi: 10.1023/A:1022947707243.
3
Costing of healthcare for improving effectiveness.为提高医疗效果进行医疗成本核算。
Health Bull (Edinb). 1999 Mar;57(2):87-93.
4
Efficiency and health.效率与健康。
Nurs Ethics. 1997 May;4(3):181-90. doi: 10.1177/096973309700400302.
5
Clinical audit in the National Health Service: fact or fiction?英国国民医疗服务体系中的临床审计:是事实还是虚构?
J Eval Clin Pract. 1996 Feb;2(1):29-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1996.tb00026.x.
6
Commentary: funding is not the only factor.
BMJ. 2002 Jan 19;324(7330):142.
7
Why health economics is economical with the truth.
Health Care Anal. 1993 Nov;1(2):197-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02197118.
8
The role of Scottish area health boards in audit and clinical effectiveness.
Health Serv Manage Res. 1999 Feb;12(1):63-7. doi: 10.1177/095148489901200107.
9
Clinical audit at the heart of clinical effectiveness.临床审计是临床疗效的核心。
J Qual Clin Pract. 1998 Mar;18(1):3-19.
10
Modern times?现代?
Health Serv J. 1997 Dec 11;107(5583):10-1.

引用本文的文献

1
New feudalism and the decline of libertarianism.新封建主义与自由主义的衰落。
Health Care Anal. 1998 Sep;6(3):181-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02678102.

本文引用的文献

1
Can economics be bad for your health?经济状况会对你的健康有害吗?
Health Care Anal. 1997 Dec;5(4):299-305. doi: 10.1007/BF02678528.
2
NHS reforms. Counting the costs.英国国家医疗服务体系改革。计算成本。
Health Serv J. 1997 Aug 21;107(5567):24-7.
3
Tautology and value: the flawed foundations of health economics.
Health Care Anal. 1997 Mar;5(1):1-5. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1042(199703)5:1<1::aid-hca205>3.0.co;2-j.
4
Clinical audit: time for a reappraisal?临床审计:是时候重新评估了吗?
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1996 Sep-Oct;30(5):415-25.
5
Health promotion community development and the tyranny of individualism.健康促进、社区发展与个人主义的专制
Health Econ. 1996 May-Jun;5(3):241-7. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199605)5:3<241::AID-HEC197>3.0.CO;2-G.
6
Quality and the medical marketplace--following elephants.质量与医疗市场——追随大象
N Engl J Med. 1996 Sep 19;335(12):883-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609193351209.