性骚扰责任与残疾歧视：适用新规则。
Sexual harassment liability & disability discrimination: new rules apply.
作者信息
Siegel P J, Kaplan R S
机构信息
Jackson, Lewis, Schnitzler and Krupman, Long Island, NY, USA.
出版信息
Caring. 1998 Oct;17(10):48-50.
PMID:10186129
Abstract
Recent decisions by the Supreme Court give some indication of how a court would rule in a sexual harassment or disability discrimination suit. Home care providers need to understand the effect of these rulings and ensure that their own policies are clear and clearly disseminated to employees.
摘要
最高法院最近做出的裁决为法院在性骚扰或残疾歧视诉讼中的裁决方式提供了一些线索。家庭护理服务提供商需要了解这些裁决的影响，并确保其自身政策清晰明确，并向员工进行了清晰的传达。
相似文献
1
Sexual harassment liability & disability discrimination: new rules apply.性骚扰责任与残疾歧视：适用新规则。
Caring. 1998 Oct;17(10):48-50.
2
Supreme Court rulings favor employers.
Provider. 1999 Aug;25(8):55, 57.
3
Sexual harassment issues in home care: what employers should do about it.
Caring. 1994 May;13(5):54-6, 58, 60.
4
Managing employment risks in home health care agencies.管理家庭健康护理机构中的就业风险。
QRC Advis. 1996 Oct;12(12):1, 5-7.
5
Sexual harassment at work: issues and answers for health care administrators.工作场所的性骚扰：医疗保健管理人员的问题与解答
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1993 Summer;38(2):167-80.
6
High court defines harassment liability.
Provider. 1998 Oct;24(10):103-4.
7
Rewriting the rules. Ten steps to avoiding sexual harassment liability.
Contemp Longterm Care. 1998 Sep;21(9):69-70.
8
Genetic discrimination: why Bragdon does not ensure protection.基因歧视：为何布拉德登案无法确保保护。
J Health Care Law Policy. 2000;3(2):330-51.
9
Who's liable when an employee quits because of sexual harassment? Supreme Court to rule on employers' liability for supervisors' conduct.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 May;135(5):657-60. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0256.
10
Sexual harassment: the whys and wherefores.性骚扰：缘由与来龙去脉
Mo Med. 2004 May-Jun;101(3):178-81.
Zotero 插件