Thompson R E
Physician Exec. 1998 Jul-Aug;24(4):52-5.
Does managed care have a sustainable future? So far, managed care has not lived up to its promises and potential. Admittedly, the health care system prior to managed care was a non-system. But its features included committed health care professionals, caring local institutions, freedom of choice, and laws reflecting public confidence. And it was based on the assumption that needed health care services are a customary, moral, and implied legal right of U.S. citizens. In contrast, today's version of managed care is characterized by financial and legal manipulation, "choice" constricted by provider selection of physician panels, and laws reflecting lack of public trust. Managed care can survive its initial foolish years, if it heeds the voices of those urging that two priorities be reflected in public policy, legislative efforts, and business practices. One of these priorities is accountability for today's actions. The other is preserving this country's health care resources. This article explored the concept of sustainability--the need to strike a balance between seeking immediate profit and preserving available resources.
管理式医疗有可持续的未来吗?到目前为止,管理式医疗并未兑现其承诺,也未发挥出其潜力。诚然,在管理式医疗出现之前的医疗体系是一个非系统性的体系。但其特点包括敬业的医疗专业人员、关怀备至的地方机构、选择自由以及反映公众信心的法律。而且它基于这样一种假设,即所需的医疗服务是美国公民的一种惯常、道德且隐含的合法权利。相比之下,如今的管理式医疗的特点是财务和法律操纵、因医疗服务提供者对医生小组的选择而受限的“选择”,以及反映公众缺乏信任的法律。如果管理式医疗听从那些敦促在公共政策、立法努力和商业实践中体现两个优先事项的人的声音,它就能度过最初的愚蠢岁月。其中一个优先事项是对当今行动负责。另一个是保护这个国家的医疗资源。本文探讨了可持续性的概念——即在追求即时利润和保护可用资源之间取得平衡的必要性。