• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理:以色列与英国的政策及服务比较及其对美国的启示

Long-term care: a comparison of policies and services in Israel and the United Kingdom and implications for the United States.

作者信息

Cox C

机构信息

Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York, NY 10023, USA.

出版信息

J Aging Soc Policy. 1997;9(2):81-99. doi: 10.1300/J031v09n02_07.

DOI:10.1300/J031v09n02_07
PMID:10186883
Abstract

The issue of long-term care continues to be a main concern in the United States. As the country wrestles with the development of policies and services, the experiences of Israel, whose system rests upon national insurance, and that of the United Kingdom, which is based on grants to local authorities, can act as valuable teaching aids in the development of programs in the United States. Although both countries focus on community care with virtually universal access, concern over resources is forcing each to target their services increasingly to the most frail. The findings underscore the necessity for accurate planning and adequate resources if services are to meet the needs of the frail elderly population.

摘要

长期护理问题在美国仍然是一个主要关切点。在美国努力制定政策和服务的过程中,以色列基于国家保险的体系以及英国基于向地方当局提供拨款的体系所积累的经验,在美国项目的发展中可作为宝贵的借鉴。尽管这两个国家都注重社区护理且几乎人人都能获得,但对资源的担忧正促使它们越来越多地将服务目标对准最脆弱的人群。研究结果强调,如果服务要满足体弱老年人群的需求,精准规划和充足资源是必要的。

相似文献

1
Long-term care: a comparison of policies and services in Israel and the United Kingdom and implications for the United States.长期护理:以色列与英国的政策及服务比较及其对美国的启示
J Aging Soc Policy. 1997;9(2):81-99. doi: 10.1300/J031v09n02_07.
2
The Israeli Long-Term Care Insurance Law: selected issues in providing home care services to the frail elderly.以色列长期护理保险法:为体弱老年人提供居家护理服务的若干问题
Health Soc Care Community. 2005 May;13(3):191-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00548.x.
3
Long-term care policy for older Americans: building a continuum of care.美国老年人长期护理政策:构建连续性护理体系
J Health Soc Policy. 2003;16(3):7-18. doi: 10.1300/J045v16n03_02.
4
Geriatrics for the 3rd millennium.第三个千年的老年医学。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2000 May 5;112(9):386-93.
5
Long-term care funding in Canada: a policy mosaic.加拿大的长期护理资金:政策拼图
J Aging Soc Policy. 2001;13(2-3):69-81. doi: 10.1300/j031v13n02_06.
6
The development of community care policy for the elderly: a comparative perspective.老年人社区护理政策的发展:比较视角
Int J Health Serv. 1996;26(4):691-708. doi: 10.2190/387A-F71L-QADX-9BP7.
7
Financing long-term care. Health and Public Policy Committee. American College of Physicians.长期护理融资。健康与公共政策委员会。美国医师学会。
Ann Intern Med. 1988 Feb;108(2):279-88.
8
Long-term care: protecting the elderly from going broke.长期护理:保护老年人免于破产。
Geriatrics. 1988 Apr;43(4):96-102.
9
[Chronic rheumatoid arthritis and the long-term care insurance system in Japan].[日本的慢性类风湿性关节炎与长期护理保险制度]
Nihon Rinsho. 2002 Dec;60(12):2437-43.
10
Myths & realities. Why most of what everybody knows about long-term care is wrong.
Brookings Rev. 1990 Fall;8(4):29-34.