Suppr超能文献

年龄在旁路血管成形术血运重建研究(BARI)随机试验中的作用。

Effect of age in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) randomized trial.

作者信息

Mullany C J, Mock M B, Brooks M M, Kelsey S F, Keller N M, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Detre K M, Frye R L

机构信息

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Feb;67(2):396-403. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01191-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The influence of age on the relative success of either percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients requiring myocardial revascularization continues to be controversial.

METHODS

In the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) trial, 1,829 patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary artery disease requiring revascularization were randomly assigned to undergo either CABG or PTCA.

RESULTS

Seven hundred nine patients (39%) were 65 to 80 years old at baseline; the other 1,120 were younger than 65 years. The in-hospital 30-day mortality rate for PTCA and CABG in the younger patients was 0.7% and 1.1%, respectively, and that for patients 65 years or older was 1.7% and 1.7%, respectively. In older compared with younger patients, stroke was more common after CABG (1.7% versus 0.2%, p = 0.015) and heart failure or pulmonary edema was more common after PTCA (4.0 versus 1.3%, p = 0.011). In both age groups, CABG resulted in greater relief of angina and fewer repeat procedures. The 5-year survival rate in patients younger than 65 years was 91.5% for CABG and 89.5% for PTCA. In patients 65 years or older, the 5-year survival rate was 85.7% for CABG and 81.4% for PTCA. Cardiac mortality at 5 years was greater in patients assigned to the PTCA group than in those assigned to the CABG group. However, no significant treatment differences were noted in cardiac mortality when only nondiabetic patients were examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the context of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation trial, older patients with multivessel coronary disease do well with either PTCA or CABG. Compared with younger patients, older patients had less recurrent angina and were less likely to undergo repeat procedures, particularly among those assigned to undergo CABG. Cardiac mortality was greater in patients 65 years or older assigned to undergo PTCA; however, this difference was not noted when treated diabetic patients were excluded from analysis.

摘要

背景

年龄对于需要心肌血运重建的患者行冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(PTCA)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的相对成功率的影响仍存在争议。

方法

在旁路血管成形术血运重建研究(BARI)试验中,1829例有症状的多支冠状动脉疾病且需要血运重建的患者被随机分配接受CABG或PTCA。

结果

709例患者(39%)基线时年龄为65至80岁;其他1120例患者年龄小于65岁。年轻患者中PTCA和CABG的院内30天死亡率分别为0.7%和1.1%,65岁及以上患者的院内30天死亡率分别为1.7%和1.7%。与年轻患者相比,老年患者CABG术后卒中更常见(1.7%对0.2%,p = 0.015),PTCA术后心力衰竭或肺水肿更常见(4.0%对1.3%,p = 0.011)。在两个年龄组中,CABG均能更有效地缓解心绞痛且再次手术较少。65岁以下患者中,CABG的5年生存率为91.5%,PTCA为89.5%。65岁及以上患者中,CABG的5年生存率为85.7%,PTCA为81.4%。PTCA组患者的5年心脏死亡率高于CABG组。然而,仅检查非糖尿病患者时,未发现心脏死亡率有显著的治疗差异。

结论

在旁路血管成形术血运重建研究试验的背景下,患有多支冠状动脉疾病的老年患者行PTCA或CABG效果均良好。与年轻患者相比,老年患者心绞痛复发较少,再次手术的可能性较小,尤其是在接受CABG的患者中。65岁及以上接受PTCA的患者心脏死亡率更高;然而,排除接受治疗的糖尿病患者进行分析时,未发现这种差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验