Suppr超能文献

间歇性顺行温血与冷晶体心脏停搏液的随机试验。

Randomized trial of intermittent antegrade warm blood versus cold crystalloid cardioplegia.

作者信息

Jacquet L M, Noirhomme P H, Van Dyck M J, El Khoury G A, Matta A J, Goenen M J, Dion R A

机构信息

Department of Cardio-thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Feb;67(2):471-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01198-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We performed a prospective randomized trial to compare intermittent antegrade warm blood cardioplegia with intermittent antegrade and retrograde cold crystalloid cardioplegia.

METHODS

Two hundred consecutive patients scheduled for isolated coronary bypass surgical procedures were randomized into two groups: Group 1 (n = 92) received cold crystalloid cardioplegia with moderate systemic hypothermia, group 2 (n = 108) received intermittent antegrade warm blood cardioplegia with systemic normothermia. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were prospectively collected.

RESULTS

For the same median number of distal anastomoses, cardiopulmonary bypass duration and total ischemic arrest duration (57.3 +/- 20.5 versus 75 +/- 22.1 minutes, p < 0.001) were shorter in group 2 than in group 1. Apart from a higher right atrial pressure in the cold cardioplegia group, no hemodynamic difference was observed. Aspartate aminotransferase, creatine kinase-MB fraction, and cardiac troponin I levels were significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1. Outcome variables were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Intermittent antegrade warm blood cardioplegia results in less myocardial cell damage than cold crystalloid cardioplegia, as assessed by the release of cardiac-specific markers. This beneficial effect has only marginal clinical consequences. Normothermic bypass has no deleterious effect on end-organ function.

摘要

背景

我们进行了一项前瞻性随机试验,以比较间歇性顺行温血心脏停搏液与间歇性顺行和逆行冷晶体心脏停搏液。

方法

连续200例计划进行单纯冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者被随机分为两组:第1组(n = 92)接受中度全身低温下的冷晶体心脏停搏液,第2组(n = 108)接受全身正常体温下的间歇性顺行温血心脏停搏液。前瞻性收集术前、术中和术后数据。

结果

在相同的远端吻合中位数的情况下,第2组的体外循环时间和总缺血停搏时间(57.3±20.5对75±22.1分钟,p<0.001)比第1组短。除了冷心脏停搏液组右心房压力较高外,未观察到血流动力学差异。第2组的天冬氨酸转氨酶、肌酸激酶-MB同工酶和心肌肌钙蛋白I水平显著低于第1组。结果变量无显著差异。

结论

通过心脏特异性标志物的释放评估,间歇性顺行温血心脏停搏液比冷晶体心脏停搏液导致的心肌细胞损伤更少。这种有益作用仅有轻微的临床影响。正常体温下的体外循环对终末器官功能无有害影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验