Bach A, Eberhardt H, Frick A, Schmidt H, Böttiger B W, Martin E
Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Medical Microbiology, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Crit Care Med. 1999 Mar;27(3):515-21. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199903000-00028.
To compare silver-coated and uncoated central venous catheters regarding bacterial colonization. To assess the relative contribution of catheter hub and skin colonization to catheter tip colonization.
Prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Intensive care unit in a university hospital.
Patients after cardiac surgery who required a central venous double-lumen catheter (DLC).
Sixty-seven adult patients were prospectively randomized to receive either a silver-coated (S group, n = 34) or an uncoated control (C group, n = 33) DLC. Blood cultures were drawn at catheter removal, and removed catheters were analyzed with quantitative cultures. Typing of microorganisms included DNA fingerprinting.
Catheters were removed if no longer necessary and aseptically divided into three segments: segment A, the catheter tip; segment B, an intermediate section; and segment C, the subcutaneous portion. Bacterial catheter colonization was quantitatively measured using sonication to detach adherent bacteria from the catheter segments in the broth and subsequent culture of an aliquot. Selected isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci and other bacteria from catheter segments were examined by means of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) after macrorestriction digestion of bacterial DNA to study colonization pathogenesis. Quantitatively lower bacterial colonization could be demonstrated on the silver-coated catheters (200 +/- 550 colony forming units [CFUs]/cm catheter segment; mean +/- SD). The difference in the control catheters (1120 +/- 5350 CFUs/cm catheter segment; mean +/- SD) was not, however, significant (p = .25). The frequency of colonization of at least one catheter segment was 52.9% for the silver-coated catheters and 57.6% for the control catheters (p= .44), without any significant differences in the colonization of corresponding catheter segments. The rate of significant catheter colonization (i.e., > or = 10(3) CFUs/cm catheter by quantitative catheter culture or > or = 10(3) CFUs/mL by luminal flush) was nine in the silver group and seven in the control group, a difference that failed to reach significance (p = .41). Two patients in both groups developed catheter-related bacteremia. Pattern analysis after PFGE demonstrated that about 70% of the isolates found on the catheter tip were identical with those on the skin at the insertion site, whereas about 75% were identical with those recovered from the hub. In 29% of colonized catheters, identical bacteria were found on the hub and the skin at the insertion site.
Silver-coating of DLCs did not significantly reduce bacterial catheter colonization compared with the control catheters. PFGE analysis of coagulase-negative staphylococci and other bacteria demonstrated various pathogenic routes of catheter-related colonization, whereby the microorganisms of the skin flora around the insertion site must be regarded as the main source of catheter-related infections.
比较涂银和未涂银的中心静脉导管的细菌定植情况。评估导管接头和皮肤定植对导管尖端定植的相对影响。
前瞻性随机临床试验。
大学医院的重症监护病房。
心脏手术后需要中心静脉双腔导管(DLC)的患者。
67例成年患者被前瞻性随机分为两组,分别接受涂银DLC(S组,n = 34)或未涂银的对照DLC(C组,n = 33)。在拔除导管时采集血培养样本,并对拔除的导管进行定量培养分析。微生物分型包括DNA指纹识别。
如果不再需要,将导管拔除并无菌分成三段:A段,导管尖端;B段,中间部分;C段,皮下部分。通过超声处理使肉汤中的导管段上的黏附细菌脱离,随后对一份等分样本进行培养,定量测量细菌在导管上的定植情况。对从导管段中分离出的凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌和其他细菌进行脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)检测,在对细菌DNA进行大片段酶切后研究定植的发病机制。涂银导管上的细菌定植数量在定量上较低(200±550菌落形成单位[CFU]/cm导管段;均值±标准差)。然而,对照导管(1120±5350 CFU/cm导管段;均值±标准差)的差异并不显著(p = 0.25)。至少一个导管段定植的频率在涂银导管中为52.9%,在对照导管中为57.6%(p = 0.44),相应导管段的定植情况无显著差异。导管显著定植率(即通过导管定量培养≥10³CFU/cm导管或通过管腔冲洗≥10³CFU/mL)在银组为9例,在对照组为7例,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.41)。两组均有2例患者发生导管相关菌血症。PFGE后的模式分析表明,在导管尖端发现的分离株中,约70%与插入部位皮肤的分离株相同,而约75%与从导管接头处分离出的相同。在29%的定植导管中,在导管接头处和插入部位的皮肤上发现了相同的细菌。
与对照导管相比,DLC涂银并未显著减少细菌在导管上的定植。对凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌和其他细菌的PFGE分析显示了导管相关定植的多种致病途径,因此插入部位周围皮肤菌群的微生物必须被视为导管相关感染的主要来源。